On Fri, 2007-11-09 at 20:02 +0100, Werner Hoch wrote: > Hi Peter > > On Donnerstag, 8. November 2007, Peter TB Brett wrote: > > On Thursday 08 November 2007 08:05, Peter TB Brett wrote: > > > Could you file a bug & assign it to me? I promise to look into it > > > (probably not for a week or two, I'm going to be over at MIT this > > > weekend and then desperately trying to catch up with work). > > > On second thoughts, this might not actually *be* a bug. Consider the > > case that you edit the database while editing a schematic -- you > > probably wouldn't want to have to close gschem and re-open it in > > order to make your changes visible to gschem. > > > I'm not sure what the best behaviour would be. Any suggestions? > > I think the copy should just create a copy of the current component and > not ask the database.
Is this seen when placing multiple copies from the component chooser, or "edit-copy"? In the edit-copy case, it should be making a direct copy. I'm not sure about the component chooser.. its probably going to the database each time, even for multiple place. This is code I've got patches for anyway (component placing), but its not currently in my head enough to answer off bat. Peter B... confer with me if you're going to fix it, It might have already been done in my (yet unmerged) refactor of component placing. Best wishes, -- Peter Clifton Electrical Engineering Division, Engineering Department, University of Cambridge, 9, JJ Thomson Avenue, Cambridge CB3 0FA Tel: +44 (0)7729 980173 - (No signal in the lab!) _______________________________________________ geda-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-dev
