On Thursday 08 November 2007 08:05, Peter TB Brett wrote:
> On Wednesday 07 November 2007 17:11:38 Werner Hoch wrote:
> > > If so, that's bad and shouldn't be happening -- the symbol data's
> > > supposed to be cached.
> >
> > gschem calls my script over and over again.
>
> Could you file a bug & assign it to me? I promise to look into it
> (probably not for a week or two, I'm going to be over at MIT this weekend
> and then desperately trying to catch up with work).
On second thoughts, this might not actually *be* a bug. Consider the case
that you edit the database while editing a schematic -- you probably wouldn't
want to have to close gschem and re-open it in order to make your changes
visible to gschem.
I'm not sure what the best behaviour would be. Any suggestions?
Peter
_______________________________________________
geda-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-dev