Hi Peter On Donnerstag, 8. November 2007, Peter TB Brett wrote: > On Thursday 08 November 2007 08:05, Peter TB Brett wrote: > > Could you file a bug & assign it to me? I promise to look into it > > (probably not for a week or two, I'm going to be over at MIT this > > weekend and then desperately trying to catch up with work).
> On second thoughts, this might not actually *be* a bug. Consider the > case that you edit the database while editing a schematic -- you > probably wouldn't want to have to close gschem and re-open it in > order to make your changes visible to gschem. > I'm not sure what the best behaviour would be. Any suggestions? I think the copy should just create a copy of the current component and not ask the database. If someone is interestet in new symbols from the database, then placing the new symbols is the right action. If someone is interested in a database reload, then we have the command edit->update component. Regards Werner _______________________________________________ geda-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-dev
