Hi Kai-Martin,

I agree to better not have another HID which replicates 99% of the GTK
HID code base, OTOH, it would be nice to be able to configure pcb to
have an OpenGl transparent look.

./configure --enable-opengl ?

Kind regards,

Bert Timmerman.

On Sun, 2008-06-15 at 17:54 +0000, Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:
> On Sun, 15 Jun 2008 18:30:33 +0200, Bert Timmerman wrote:
> 
> > Would it be an idea to modify this patch into a OpenGL-HID version ?
> 
> Please, not another HID! It is already a pain with the current two. As a 
> user you never know if a certain wart is associated with the common 
> infrastructure or just with the HID. Some usability tips apply only to 
> one of the HIDS. The GTK-HID has the tendency to lag behind. No active 
> developer feels responsible specifically for the GTK-HID.  
> 
> IMHO, the new gerbv shows the way to go: If some important feature is too 
> slow on some hardware, there should be a switch available in the running 
> application. Transparent rendering of tracks is a good example for this. 
> If it works at sufficient speed, it is a real bonus in usability. 
> OpenGL is also a case where you can't know in advance whether or not you 
> end up with the speed of a racing snail. Even fast, contemporary hardware 
> may include graphic card for which there is no accelerated driver 
> available. On the other hand, with proper drivers OpenGL can yield 
> blitzing results even on somewhat aged hardware. I am regularly amazed 
> about the performance of the 3D mechanical CAD application varicad. 
> Pretty complex structures with literally thousands of polygons pan and 
> rotate way faster in 3D than my current pcb layouts do in 2D.    
> 
> ---<(kaimartin)>---



_______________________________________________
geda-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-dev

Reply via email to