On Sun, 06 Jul 2008 14:23:57 -0700, Newell Jensen wrote: > Since I haven't done much circuit design with geda, and > the fact that it seems like this tree could get in a mess real quick, I > am looking to see what suggestions people have.
IMHO, the tree in the project manager should correspond to a directory structure in the file system. This would add confidence and allow for a GUI/CLI mixed workflow. My current projects are organized like this: $NAME |__$NAME_0_master.sch |__$NAME_1_firstsubsheet.sch |__$NAME_2_secondsubsheet.sch |__$NAME.pcb |__$NAME.g2p |__gafrc |__gschemrc | |__gerber | |__$NAME_*.gbr | |__$NAME_*.cnc | |__print | |__$NAME_schematic.ps | |__$NAME_schematic.png | |__$NAME_frontassembly_refdes.ps | |__$NAME_frontassembly_value.ps | |__$NAME.bom1 | |__$NAME.bom2 | |__backup | |__docs | |__$NAME_manual.tex | |__$NAME_manual.ps | |__$NAME_calculation.gnumeric | |__simulation | |__$NAME.spice | |__enclosing | |__$NAME_3DCAD.dwg | |__$NAME_2Ddrawing.ps | |__$NAME_2Ddrwing_2.ps | |__OldVersion |... |... ---<(kaimartin)>--- -- Kai-Martin Knaak http://lilalaser.de/blog _______________________________________________ geda-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-dev
