On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 12:14:58PM -0600, John Doty wrote: > > On Aug 14, 2010, at 11:34 AM, Andrew Poelstra wrote: > > > On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 03:17:42AM -0400, Paul Tan wrote: > >> ...In fact, I would like to see that gEDA can process ANY attributes > >> attached to a net in similar fashion as it process ANY attributes > >> attached to a symbol currently. > >> > > > > I agree, but I'm not sure this would be useful until we find a way > > to split nets up into subnets - which is a much more complicated > > change. > > Not so much. We already draw nets as segments, and attributes are actually > attached to segments, not nets. Might need to modify the segment merging > rules, but that's about it. And one could argue that the automatic segment > merging is already a case of the tool inappropriately trying to outsmart the > user. >
I see. We do do this in gschem - but not in pcb, nor in the .net file coming out of gsch2pcb. So PCB would need a breaking change in its .net and .pcb formats, no? Andrew _______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list [email protected] http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
