John Doty <[email protected]> writes: > On Jan 24, 2011, at 11:57 AM, Kai-Martin Knaak wrote: > >> Steven Michalske wrote: >> >>> We would also need a way to force the chosen name of the net to choose >>> when merging nets. e.g. When you merge a net named power with a net >>> named 3v3_power, who wins? >> >> If a two pin symbol mediates the fusion, this would be determined >> by the connections to the symbol. The symbol would comprise a win-pin >> and a loose-pin. The winner would be the net that is connected to the >> win-pin. > > Works for the simplest case: > > net1 net2 > -----------(WP,LP)------------ > > The combined net would be "net1". > > But a little more complicated: > > net1 net2 net3 > -----------(WP,LP)------------(LP,WP)--------- > > Is this "net1" or "net3"?
At some point the user looses for his own stupitity. I'd just require a well defined topology, and tell the user if the resolution is not unique, then he has to accept arbitrary results, based on the random order of evaluation of the shorts. -- Stephan _______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list [email protected] http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
