FWIW, I have found it to be very valuable to have a repository revision number in simulation outputs. Weeks later, when you try to figure out which crazy version of the code generated some random set of results, it can be extremely helpful for tracking things down.
I would be a fan of fixing this with a compile-time option that is off by default as Nate suggests. Regards, -Thomas Wenisch On Jun 22, 2011, at 1:03 PM, nathan binkert wrote: >> Annoying, I responded to this yesterday with the wrong account and got a >> list rejection that I didn't notice until now. >> >> Anyhow, thanks - I'll just make my own personal patch to get it back, I can >> see how extra regressions would be annoying. > > If you (and others) like it, it could be a compile time option. We > could probably also fix it if we handled it more like date.cc is > handled. That shouldn't be too hard. > > Nate > _______________________________________________ > gem5-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev _______________________________________________ gem5-dev mailing list [email protected] http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev
