I can give it a shot. Not able to provide an ETA just yet. Lisa
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 1:27 PM, nathan binkert <[email protected]> wrote: > > I like Nate's date.cc idea... basically that says whenever you build a > > binary, stick the current info in, but just because the info has > > changed that's not sufficient reason to consider the binary out of > > date. That's the same policy we use wrt the date and time. > > Actually, I took a quick look and I'm not sure why date.cc works. It > explicitly depends on all other cc files which is why it is rebuilt, > but I'm not sure why the date change itself doesn't trigger a rebuild. > It could be because __DATE__ is simply an implicit variable and the > SCons scanner doesn't see any input changes and never scans the file > again after the first time. > > We could add the hg revision to date.cc (and pass it in via a #define) > and perhaps use the Ignore() directive on it? > > Lisa, want to give it a shot? > > Nate > _______________________________________________ > gem5-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev > > _______________________________________________ gem5-dev mailing list [email protected] http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev
