> On 2011-12-20 01:16:59, Gabe Black wrote: > > src/cpu/checker/cpu.cc, line 332 > > <http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/910/diff/3/?file=16278#file16278line332> > > > > No {}s, indentation.
I know we just had this discussion recently... as I said then, I distinctly recall a period in time where we decided that we should *always* have braces even around single-statement blocks, for consistency and to make it easier to add new lines to the block (even temporarily, e.g. for debugging) without having to add the braces. Obviously that policy didn't make it into the official style guide, and I was always somewhat ambivalent about it anyway, so I'm not trying to revive it. However, it's equally true that the converse of that policy is not in the style guide, i.e., there's no requirement to *not* have braces around single-statement blocks either. So IMO Geoff should be free to disregard those specific comments of yours. (Though there are a few places where the brace does need to be moved to the preceding line if it's not deleted.) If we want to have a discussion about whether or not we should amend the style guide to specifically cover single-statement blocks, we should do that in a separate thread. I'm fine with leaving it at the coder's discretion though. - Steve ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/910/#review1764 ----------------------------------------------------------- On 2011-12-13 13:25:24, Geoffrey Blake wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/910/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated 2011-12-13 13:25:24) > > > Review request for Default, Ali Saidi, Gabe Black, Steve Reinhardt, and > Nathan Binkert. > > > Summary > ------- > > CheckerCPU: Re-factor CheckerCPU to be compatible with current gem5 > > Brings the CheckerCPU back to a functioning state allowing FS and SE mode > checking of the O3CPU. These changes have only been tested with the > ARM ISA. Other ISAs will potentially require modification. > > > Diffs > ----- > > configs/common/FSConfig.py c1ab57ea8805 > src/arch/arm/isa.cc c1ab57ea8805 > src/arch/arm/isa/insts/m5ops.isa c1ab57ea8805 > src/arch/arm/isa/insts/misc.isa c1ab57ea8805 > src/arch/arm/table_walker.hh c1ab57ea8805 > src/arch/arm/table_walker.cc c1ab57ea8805 > src/arch/arm/tlb.hh c1ab57ea8805 > src/arch/arm/tlb.cc c1ab57ea8805 > src/arch/arm/utility.cc c1ab57ea8805 > src/cpu/BaseCPU.py c1ab57ea8805 > src/cpu/CheckerCPU.py c1ab57ea8805 > src/cpu/DummyChecker.py PRE-CREATION > src/cpu/SConscript c1ab57ea8805 > src/cpu/base.cc c1ab57ea8805 > src/cpu/base_dyn_inst.hh c1ab57ea8805 > src/cpu/base_dyn_inst_impl.hh c1ab57ea8805 > src/cpu/checker/cpu.hh c1ab57ea8805 > src/cpu/checker/cpu.cc c1ab57ea8805 > src/cpu/checker/cpu_impl.hh c1ab57ea8805 > src/cpu/checker/thread_context.hh c1ab57ea8805 > src/cpu/dummy_checker_builder.cc PRE-CREATION > src/cpu/o3/O3CPU.py c1ab57ea8805 > src/cpu/o3/O3Checker.py c1ab57ea8805 > src/cpu/o3/checker_builder.cc c1ab57ea8805 > src/cpu/o3/commit_impl.hh c1ab57ea8805 > src/cpu/o3/cpu.hh c1ab57ea8805 > src/cpu/o3/cpu.cc c1ab57ea8805 > src/cpu/o3/dyn_inst_impl.hh c1ab57ea8805 > src/cpu/o3/fetch_impl.hh c1ab57ea8805 > src/cpu/o3/iew_impl.hh c1ab57ea8805 > src/cpu/o3/lsq_unit_impl.hh c1ab57ea8805 > src/cpu/o3/thread_context.hh c1ab57ea8805 > src/cpu/o3/thread_context_impl.hh c1ab57ea8805 > src/cpu/simple/BaseSimpleCPU.py c1ab57ea8805 > src/cpu/simple/base.hh c1ab57ea8805 > src/cpu/simple/base.cc c1ab57ea8805 > src/cpu/simple_thread.hh c1ab57ea8805 > src/cpu/thread_context.hh c1ab57ea8805 > src/dev/Device.py c1ab57ea8805 > src/dev/isa_fake.hh c1ab57ea8805 > src/dev/isa_fake.cc c1ab57ea8805 > > Diff: http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/910/diff > > > Testing > ------- > > Successfully runs gzip in SE mode. Successfully boots linux kernel in FS > mode. Works with checkpoints and fast-forwarding. Testing with buggy O3CPUs > to test checker's capabilities. > > > Thanks, > > Geoffrey > > _______________________________________________ gem5-dev mailing list [email protected] http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev
