> On Feb. 27, 2012, 7:30 p.m., Ali Saidi wrote: > > Ship It! > > Gabe Black wrote: > Uh, this really didn't look it was ready to ship. Ankita said it didn't > fix her problem, and Nilay said he was going to write a new version. > > Ali Saidi wrote: > It seems to fix the problem reported for me and we don't know how long > it's going to take to get a improved solution that fixes the interrupt, tlb, > everything else for all the architectures. I'd prefer to commit this now so > the functionality isn't broken in the head and then un-do it when a more > complete fix is available. Thoughts? > > Gabe Black wrote: > If it fixes the problem then sure, that makes sense. I'm curious why it > didn't work for Ankita. > > Andreas Hansson wrote: > I did ask Ankita to re-run everything with the patch as it definitely > solves the problem on my side. Any news on this front, Ankita?
I have posted two new patches, these combine the patch posted by Andreas and the one that Ali emailed me. - Nilay ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1062/#review2217 ----------------------------------------------------------- On Feb. 24, 2012, 10:35 a.m., Andreas Hansson wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1062/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Feb. 24, 2012, 10:35 a.m.) > > > Review request for Default. > > > Description > ------- > > CPU: Fix switching in of x86 CPU with interrupt and TLB ports > > This patch fixes the, currently broken, switching of CPUs for x86 by > ensuring that the interrupt device does not initialise the ports if > the CPU is not connected, and also ensures that the TLB walker ports > of the new CPU are actually connected. To do the latter the getPort of > the TLB and TLB walker for x86 were added to override the BaseTLB that > returns NULL. > > > Diffs > ----- > > src/arch/alpha/interrupts.hh 241ee47b0dc6 > src/arch/arm/interrupts.hh 241ee47b0dc6 > src/arch/mips/interrupts.hh 241ee47b0dc6 > src/arch/power/interrupts.hh 241ee47b0dc6 > src/arch/sparc/interrupts.hh 241ee47b0dc6 > src/arch/x86/interrupts.hh 241ee47b0dc6 > src/arch/x86/interrupts.cc 241ee47b0dc6 > src/arch/x86/pagetable_walker.hh 241ee47b0dc6 > src/arch/x86/tlb.hh 241ee47b0dc6 > src/arch/x86/tlb.cc 241ee47b0dc6 > src/cpu/base.cc 241ee47b0dc6 > > Diff: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1062/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > util/regress all passing (disregarding t1000 and eio) > > > Thanks, > > Andreas Hansson > > _______________________________________________ gem5-dev mailing list [email protected] http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev
