-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1109/#review2344
-----------------------------------------------------------

Ship it!


looks fine to me, maybe change L at the same time?
Ali


- Ali Saidi


On March 21, 2012, 10:04 a.m., Andreas Hansson wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1109/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated March 21, 2012, 10:04 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Default.
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Power: Change bitfield name to avoid conflicts with range_map
> 
> This patch changes the name of a bitfield from W to W_FIELD to avoid
> clashes with W being used as a class (typename) in the templatized
> range_map. The problem only manifested itself with gcc 4.6 after
> seemingly unrelated changes, but is likely to cause similar issues in
> the future and thus worth fixing. The relevant parts of the decoder
> are updated.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/arch/power/isa/bitfields.isa c739a3a829f5 
>   src/arch/power/isa/decoder.isa c739a3a829f5 
> 
> Diff: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1109/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> util/regress all passing (disregarding t1000 and eio)
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Andreas Hansson
> 
>

_______________________________________________
gem5-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev

Reply via email to