----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1102/ -----------------------------------------------------------
(Updated April 4, 2012, 11:39 a.m.) Review request for Default. Summary (updated) ----------------- * * * Description (updated) ------- Changeset 8928:11ebb7f1d6de --------------------------- * * * Ruby X86: problem in setting DMA port, related to the changeset 8850 I think since the dma port is assigned twice (once in SouthBridge.py, and once by Ruby somewhere) an extra port gets created which has no peer port. This results in a segmentation fault when a simulation is started. The posted patch solves the problem, but it is not the solution I am looking for. Andreas, do you have some idea how to handle this issue? Diffs (updated) ----- configs/common/FSConfig.py 570b44fe6e04 configs/example/ruby_fs.py 570b44fe6e04 configs/example/ruby_mem_test.py 570b44fe6e04 configs/ruby/MESI_CMP_directory.py 570b44fe6e04 configs/ruby/MI_example.py 570b44fe6e04 configs/ruby/MOESI_CMP_directory.py 570b44fe6e04 configs/ruby/MOESI_CMP_token.py 570b44fe6e04 configs/ruby/MOESI_hammer.py 570b44fe6e04 configs/ruby/Network_test.py 570b44fe6e04 configs/ruby/Ruby.py 570b44fe6e04 src/dev/x86/Pc.py 570b44fe6e04 src/dev/x86/SouthBridge.py 570b44fe6e04 Diff: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1102/diff/ Testing ------- Thanks, Nilay Vaish _______________________________________________ gem5-dev mailing list [email protected] http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev
