-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1195/#review2763
-----------------------------------------------------------



src/cpu/checker/cpu_impl.hh
<http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1195/#comment3109>

    Why aren't we skipping the ExtMachInst completely here, and just doing
    instPtr = thread->decoder.decode(pcState)
    ?



src/cpu/inorder/resources/fetch_unit.cc
<http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1195/#comment3112>

    same comment as above... this function name makes no sense in the modified 
context where the code doesn't mention extMachInst otherwise



src/cpu/legiontrace.cc
<http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1195/#comment3111>

    the concept of "extMachInst" is meaningless now, so this function name 
doesn't make sense in context.  should it be decoderReady() or something like 
that?



src/cpu/o3/fetch_impl.hh
<http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1195/#comment3113>

    similar thing here... how is !extMachInstReady() at this point different 
from needMoreBytes()?  The latter sounds more intuitively like what you want to 
call based on the name of the flag.


- Steve Reinhardt


On May 15, 2012, 5:56 a.m., Gabe Black wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1195/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated May 15, 2012, 5:56 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Default.
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Changeset 9009:769d2142cbd4
> ---------------------------
> CPU: Merge the predecoder and decoder.
> 
> These classes are always used together, and merging them will give the ISAs
> more flexibility in how they cache things and manage the process.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/arch/SConscript f681719e2e99 
>   src/arch/alpha/decoder.hh PRE-CREATION 
>   src/arch/alpha/isa/main.isa f681719e2e99 
>   src/arch/alpha/predecoder.hh f681719e2e99 
>   src/arch/arm/SConscript f681719e2e99 
>   src/arch/arm/decoder.hh PRE-CREATION 
>   src/arch/arm/decoder.cc PRE-CREATION 
>   src/arch/arm/predecoder.hh f681719e2e99 
>   src/arch/arm/predecoder.cc f681719e2e99 
>   src/arch/arm/types.hh f681719e2e99 
>   src/arch/mips/decoder.hh PRE-CREATION 
>   src/arch/mips/predecoder.hh f681719e2e99 
>   src/arch/power/decoder.hh PRE-CREATION 
>   src/arch/sparc/decoder.hh PRE-CREATION 
>   src/arch/sparc/predecoder.hh f681719e2e99 
>   src/arch/x86/SConscript f681719e2e99 
>   src/arch/x86/decoder.hh PRE-CREATION 
>   src/arch/x86/decoder.cc PRE-CREATION 
>   src/arch/x86/decoder_tables.cc PRE-CREATION 
>   src/arch/x86/emulenv.cc f681719e2e99 
>   src/arch/x86/isa/decoder/one_byte_opcodes.isa f681719e2e99 
>   src/arch/x86/predecoder.hh f681719e2e99 
>   src/arch/x86/predecoder.cc f681719e2e99 
>   src/arch/x86/predecoder_tables.cc f681719e2e99 
>   src/arch/x86/types.hh f681719e2e99 
>   src/cpu/base.hh f681719e2e99 
>   src/cpu/checker/cpu.hh f681719e2e99 
>   src/cpu/checker/cpu_impl.hh f681719e2e99 
>   src/cpu/inorder/cpu.hh f681719e2e99 
>   src/cpu/inorder/cpu.cc f681719e2e99 
>   src/cpu/inorder/resources/cache_unit.hh f681719e2e99 
>   src/cpu/inorder/resources/cache_unit.cc f681719e2e99 
>   src/cpu/inorder/resources/fetch_unit.hh f681719e2e99 
>   src/cpu/inorder/resources/fetch_unit.cc f681719e2e99 
>   src/cpu/inorder/thread_context.hh f681719e2e99 
>   src/cpu/legiontrace.cc f681719e2e99 
>   src/cpu/o3/fetch.hh f681719e2e99 
>   src/cpu/o3/fetch_impl.hh f681719e2e99 
>   src/cpu/simple/atomic.cc f681719e2e99 
>   src/cpu/simple/base.hh f681719e2e99 
>   src/cpu/simple/base.cc f681719e2e99 
>   src/cpu/simple_thread.cc f681719e2e99 
> 
> Diff: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1195/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Gabe Black
> 
>

_______________________________________________
gem5-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev

Reply via email to