Brad, 

So can the boot loader be accessed out of the PIO bus when
the address of the PIO and DRAM space are discontinuous? If so, then it
should work without Andrew's changes, if not it seems like that should
be easy enough to fix because Ruby is sorta skipping that right now
anyway? 

Thanks, 

Ali 

On 30.05.2012 17:08, Beckmann, Brad wrote: 

>
Yes, that is correct. Accessing the boot loader out on the PIO bus
should work just fine assuming it maps to a different physical address
space than DRAM. Also Andrew's observations definitely jive with my
expectations. Currently Ruby does not support discontinuous address
spaces.
> 
> Brad
> 
>> -----Original Message----- From:
[email protected] [2] [mailto:gem5-dev- [email protected] [3]] On
Behalf Of Ali Saidi Sent: Friday, May 25, 2012 8:24 AM To: gem5
Developer List Subject: Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request: ARM: Enable Ruby
functionality with ARM FS Hi Andrew, The boot loader we used is only a
couple of KB, so it doesn't need to be that big, but what I read into
Brad's comment was that we could execute the boot loader if it was
attached to a ROM outside of main memory as long as we didn't care about
the Ruby timing. Brad, did I get that right? In this case couldn't we
run the boot loader out of a simple memory connected to a pio bus only
use Ruby for the contiguous memory? Thanks, Ali On 5/24/12 6:22 PM,
"Andrew Cebulski" <[email protected] [4]> wrote: 
>> 
>>> The 172 MB was
simply because that's the only way I can see to get Ruby to find the
boot loader ROM...by moving it from the higher address space to the
lower. I left out that the boot loader ROM is 64MB, therefore I had to
shrink the DRAM by 64MB. Basically, it seems Ruby supports multiple
contiguous address spaces, just not discontiguous. Is there something I
am missing with regards to the ROM...maybe it doesn't need to be 64MB?
-Andrew On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 4:01 PM, Ali Saidi <[email protected] [1]>
wrote: 
>>> 
>>>> On 24.05.2012 15:23, Beckmann, Brad wrote: 
>>>>

>>>>> Sorry for the much
>>>> delayed response here. I've been too
selective reading the gem5-dev list lately. 
>>>> 
>>>>> So if I
understand correctly, the ARM FS boot loader maps
>>>> to some higher
portion of the address space and you would like to model the accesses to
this boot loader ROM through Ruby. Is that correct? I'm a bit confused
with the comment that the maximum memory supported by Ruby is 172 MB.
That certainly is not true. This isn't true, but what I'm not
understating is why it was done in the first place.
>> that 
>> 
>>>>
hasn't been fully flushed out. Improving the mapping functions requires
better coordination between the python config files and Ruby. I don't
have a clear idea of how to do it, but I'm happy to discuss
>> ideas. I
think most people would be happy in the above worked, although long term
that would be a good solution. the response, Ali Brad -----Original
Message----- From: Links: ------ [1] mailto:[email protected] [5] [2]
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1191/#review2708 [6]
_______________________________________________ gem5-dev mailing list
[email protected] [7] http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev [8]
_______________________________________________ gem5-dev mailing list
[email protected] [9] http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev [10] --
IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are
confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended
recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the
contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy
the information in any medium. Thank you.
_______________________________________________ gem5-dev mailing list
[email protected] [11]
> 
>
_______________________________________________
> gem5-dev mailing
list
> [email protected]
> http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev




Links:
------
[1] mailto:[email protected]
[2]
mailto:[email protected]
[3] mailto:[email protected]
[4]
mailto:[email protected]
[5] mailto:[email protected]
[6]
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1191/#review2708
[7]
mailto:[email protected]
[8]
http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev
[9]
mailto:[email protected]
[10]
http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev
[11]
mailto:[email protected]
_______________________________________________
gem5-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev

Reply via email to