On Jan 15, 2013, at 6:59 PM, Nilay Vaish <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, 15 Jan 2013, Ali Saidi wrote: > >> >> >>> On Jan. 8, 2013, 6:29 a.m., Ali Saidi wrote: >>>> Hi Nilay, >>>> >>>> Thanks for resurrecting this. In principle I have no issues, I just would >>>> like to make sure that the moved code includes all the latest fixes to the >>>> branch predictor that numerous people have contributed to. If so and you >>>> get no stats differences please commit. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Ali >>>> >> >> I'm still not sure why stats changes should occur. There may be some >> differences, but since a lot more effort has been put in verifying the o3 >> cpu branch predictor by people like Nathanael, it would be good to keep that >> one around and make it work with the in-order cpu or add the methods as >> appropriate. >> >> > > The stats would changes only for the inorder-cpu. For the o3 cpu, they would > remain the same. Thanks Nilay, that sounds good. Ali
_______________________________________________ gem5-dev mailing list [email protected] http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev
