On Thu, January 24, 2013 8:50 am, Nilay wrote: > On Thu, January 24, 2013 3:08 am, Nilay wrote: > >> >> Seems like I will not be able to keep my promise. Following differences >> were found after running all the regression tests -- >> >> 1. tests/long/se/20.parser/ref/arm/linux/o3-timing/ >> sim_insts 505237723 505237723 0 >> +0.00% >> sim_ops 569624283 569624283 0 >> +0.00% >> sim_ticks 199845137000 199893963500 48826500 >> +0.02% >> >> 2. tests/quick/se/00.hello/ref/sparc/linux/inorder-timing/ >> None to sim_insts, sim_ops, sim_ticks, but other stats change. >> >> 3. tests/quick/se/02.insttest/ref/sparc/linux/inorder-timing/ >> None to sim_insts, sim_ops, sim_ticks, but other stats change. >> >> Ali, is this fine with you? >> > > I am right now unable to explain what's causing these changes. I'll do > some more experimentation and get back. >
The test 20.parser fails for ARM even with out the patch being applied, with same stats when the patch is applied. I am assuming that this due either some difference in the compiler, or because of some uninitialized value being in use. I am not going to update the stats for 20.parser. The other two would be update. -- Nilay _______________________________________________ gem5-dev mailing list [email protected] http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev
