I think the parser issues we've had before and it even depends on how it
is executed on zizzer (on command line, through python, and even with
different ways of invoking it through python)

Andreas

On 24/01/2013 18:17, "Nilay" <[email protected]> wrote:

>On Thu, January 24, 2013 8:50 am, Nilay wrote:
>> On Thu, January 24, 2013 3:08 am, Nilay wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Seems like I will not be able to keep my promise. Following differences
>>> were found after running all the regression tests --
>>>
>>> 1. tests/long/se/20.parser/ref/arm/linux/o3-timing/
>>>   sim_insts                       505237723  505237723          0
>>> +0.00%
>>>   sim_ops                         569624283  569624283          0
>>> +0.00%
>>>   sim_ticks                      199845137000 199893963500   48826500
>>> +0.02%
>>>
>>> 2. tests/quick/se/00.hello/ref/sparc/linux/inorder-timing/
>>> None to sim_insts, sim_ops, sim_ticks, but other stats change.
>>>
>>> 3. tests/quick/se/02.insttest/ref/sparc/linux/inorder-timing/
>>> None to sim_insts, sim_ops, sim_ticks, but other stats change.
>>>
>>> Ali, is this fine with you?
>>>
>>
>> I am right now unable to explain what's causing these changes. I'll do
>> some more experimentation and get back.
>>
>
>The test 20.parser fails for ARM even with out the patch being applied,
>with same stats when the patch is applied. I am assuming that this due
>either some difference in the compiler, or because of some uninitialized
>value being in use. I am not going to update the stats for 20.parser. The
>other two would be update.
>
>--
>Nilay
>
>_______________________________________________
>gem5-dev mailing list
>[email protected]
>http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev
>


-- IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are 
confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, 
please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any 
other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any 
medium.  Thank you.

_______________________________________________
gem5-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev

Reply via email to