I have attached profiling results from two runs. While overall we do not
see much difference, but it seems some regressions are gaining and some
are losing.
Here is a summary of the two runs. The data is the difference between
the time taken for the run with the multi-threading patch applied and
the time taken for the run without it.
Run 1
-----
All regression tests:
---------------------
Maximum Gain in Time (s) 305.37
Average Gain in Time (s) -33.2935971223
Maximum % 125
Average % -1.0315445599
Only long regression tests:
---------------------------
Maximum (long) 305.37
Average (long) -66.0515714286
Maximum % (long) 15.7268292683
Average % (long) -0.9671363525
Run 2
-----
All regression tests:
---------------------
Maximum Gain in Time (s) 552.08
Average Gain in Time -0.3939568345
Maximum % 60
Average % -2.1395937762
Only long regression tests:
---------------------------
Maximum (long) 552.08
Average (long) -1.534
Maximum % (long) 17.0595645132
Average % (long) -0.4627593543
--
Nilay
On 2013-10-12 06:56, Andreas Hansson wrote:
Hi Nilay,
I haven't tried OS X. The results I reported are RHE5 and Ubuntu 10.04,
both with gcc >= 4.7.
Andreas
On 10/11/13 6:47 PM, "Nilay" <[email protected]> wrote:
On 2013-10-08 12:37, Andreas Hansson wrote:
Hi Nilay,
Unfortunately I haven't found the time to dig into this yet.
I only have the output from last nights regression, and thus not with
and
without your patch. I'll take a snapshot and compare, although I
suspect
the individual runs vary quite a bit.
Have you attempted any further profiling?
No, I have not. Are you running on OS X?
--
Nilay
_______________________________________________
gem5-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev
