> On Nov. 25, 2014, 9:52 p.m., Nilay Vaish wrote:
> > I don't know what are we trying to achieve by interfacing gem5 and SystemC. 
> >  But the patch seems fine to me.

I would think roughly 90% of all the SoC model components in the world are 
written using SystemC as it is the de facto modeling framework (and an IEEE 
standard). Thus, interfacing gem5 with SystemC opens up for a wide variety of 
use cases that were not possible before. Makes sense?


- Andreas


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2503/#review5538
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Nov. 17, 2014, 6:18 a.m., Andreas Hansson wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2503/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Nov. 17, 2014, 6:18 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Default.
> 
> 
> Repository: gem5
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Changeset 10554:f6e35a3dcc8f
> ---------------------------
> config: SystemC Gem5Control top level additions
> 
> This patch cleans up a few style issues and adds a few capabilities to the
> SystemC top level 'Gem5Control/Gem5System' mechanism.  These include:
> 
>     1) A space to store/retrieve a version string for a model
>     2) A mechanism for registering functions to be called at the end of
>         elaboration to perform simulation setup tasks in SystemC
>     3) Adding setGDBRemotePort to the Gem5Control
>     4) Changing the sc_set_time_resolution behaviour to instead check that
>         the SystemC time resolution is already acceptable
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   util/systemc/sc_gem5_control.hh 1a9e235cab09 
>   util/systemc/sc_gem5_control.cc 1a9e235cab09 
> 
> Diff: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2503/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Andreas Hansson
> 
>

_______________________________________________
gem5-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev

Reply via email to