Hi Nilay, I welcome anyone to invest the effort.
Andreas On 11/28/14, 3:05 PM, "Nilay Vaish" <[email protected]> wrote: >On Tue, 25 Nov 2014, Andreas Hansson wrote: > >> >> >>> On Nov. 25, 2014, 9:52 p.m., Nilay Vaish wrote: >>>> I don't know what are we trying to achieve by interfacing gem5 and >>>>SystemC. But the patch seems fine to me. >> >> I would think roughly 90% of all the SoC model components in the world >> are written using SystemC as it is the de facto modeling framework (and >> an IEEE standard). Thus, interfacing gem5 with SystemC opens up for a >> wide variety of use cases that were not possible before. Makes sense? > >If 90% of all SoC development is done using SystemC, why would you not >want to write the entire simulator using SystemC? > >-- >Nilay > -- IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium. Thank you. ARM Limited, Registered office 110 Fulbourn Road, Cambridge CB1 9NJ, Registered in England & Wales, Company No: 2557590 ARM Holdings plc, Registered office 110 Fulbourn Road, Cambridge CB1 9NJ, Registered in England & Wales, Company No: 2548782 _______________________________________________ gem5-dev mailing list [email protected] http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev
