Nilay,

Coalescing and buffering requests in the Sequencer is very important for good 
performance.  As long as we have a per address interface between our CPU/GPU 
models and Ruby, we need to cache block optimizations in Ruby.

Brad


-----Original Message-----
From: gem5-dev [mailto:gem5-dev-boun...@gem5.org] On Behalf Of Nilay Vaish via 
gem5-dev
Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2014 7:36 AM
To: Nilay Vaish; Steve Reinhardt; Default
Subject: Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 2276: ruby: don't make O3 CPU squash on 
loads that hit outstanding requests


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2276/#review5621
-----------------------------------------------------------


Steve, is it all right to buffer requests in the Sequencer?  I am not even in 
favor of having a sequencer and buffering requests makes it worse.


src/mem/ruby/system/Sequencer.cc
<http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2276/#comment5024>

    initialize to false?


- Nilay Vaish


On June 21, 2014, 5 p.m., Steve Reinhardt wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2276/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated June 21, 2014, 5 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Default.
> 
> 
> Repository: gem5
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Changeset 10240:b01d667ec431
> ---------------------------
> ruby: don't make O3 CPU squash on loads that hit outstanding requests
> 
> Mismatch between O3 and Ruby in handling aliased requests: Ruby 
> returns false when it sees aliased request or memory blocked. O3 
> squash and refetch when it sees false signal from Ruby.
> 
> Fix: Merging readRequestTable and writeRequestTable in a single table 
> that maps requesting address and all requests that are aliased with 
> the address.
> 
> This work was done while Binh was an intern at AMD Research.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/mem/packet.cc b21b3aad6bd1d01ac8a4d8030479bbca417af8d1 
>   src/mem/protocol/RubySlicc_Exports.sm 
> b21b3aad6bd1d01ac8a4d8030479bbca417af8d1 
>   src/mem/ruby/system/DMASequencer.hh 
> b21b3aad6bd1d01ac8a4d8030479bbca417af8d1 
>   src/mem/ruby/system/DMASequencer.cc 
> b21b3aad6bd1d01ac8a4d8030479bbca417af8d1 
>   src/mem/ruby/system/RubyPort.hh b21b3aad6bd1d01ac8a4d8030479bbca417af8d1 
>   src/mem/ruby/system/RubyPort.cc b21b3aad6bd1d01ac8a4d8030479bbca417af8d1 
>   src/mem/ruby/system/RubyPortProxy.hh 
> b21b3aad6bd1d01ac8a4d8030479bbca417af8d1 
>   src/mem/ruby/system/RubyPortProxy.cc 
> b21b3aad6bd1d01ac8a4d8030479bbca417af8d1 
>   src/mem/ruby/system/Sequencer.hh b21b3aad6bd1d01ac8a4d8030479bbca417af8d1 
>   src/mem/ruby/system/Sequencer.cc 
> b21b3aad6bd1d01ac8a4d8030479bbca417af8d1
> 
> Diff: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2276/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Steve Reinhardt
> 
>

_______________________________________________
gem5-dev mailing list
gem5-dev@gem5.org
http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev
_______________________________________________
gem5-dev mailing list
gem5-dev@gem5.org
http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev

Reply via email to