On Tue, 12 May 2015, Brad Beckmann wrote:
On May 12, 2015, 3:55 p.m., Nilay Vaish wrote:
You need to provide example of what this change is trying to achieve.
Personally, if wanted buffers to have a size, I would want to that size
to be configurable in python.
Would it be helpful if we described an example in the patch description? This
is obviously an improvement in functionality that people may want to use.
I agree that eventually we would want to do this in Python. I'll let Mark
comment on that.
As I see it, you are cluttering the compiler. So, no, it is not an
improvement. How many more keywords should SLICC have before we would say
this is not the way we should be doing things?
--
Nilay
_______________________________________________
gem5-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev
