Hi Nilay, Good points. clang 3.1 would match gcc 4.7 (and then some).
Andreas On 15/06/2015 17:07, "Nilay Vaish" <[email protected]> wrote: >On Tue, 16 Jun 2015, Andreas Hansson wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> We are really keen to adopt gcc 4.7 as a minimum requirement, thus >>enabling the following c++11 features: >> >> 1. Explicit virtual overrides >> 2. Non-static data member initializers >> 3. Template aliases >> 4. Delegating constructors >> >> Switching to gcc 4.7 would also allow us to finally transition from >>--std=c++0x to --std=c++11. >> >> All major distros are shipping with gcc >= 4.7, also for LTS releases. >>The potential challenge is RHE6 and its derivatives (and perhaps even >>the odd Ubuntu 12.04 installation). >> >> Any major objections? Thoughts? >> > >Seems fine to me. GCC 4.7 has been around for three years and we made a >similar switch last year as well. Do we need to bump clang as well? > >-- >Nilay >_______________________________________________ >gem5-dev mailing list >[email protected] >http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev -- IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium. Thank you. ARM Limited, Registered office 110 Fulbourn Road, Cambridge CB1 9NJ, Registered in England & Wales, Company No: 2557590 ARM Holdings plc, Registered office 110 Fulbourn Road, Cambridge CB1 9NJ, Registered in England & Wales, Company No: 2548782 _______________________________________________ gem5-dev mailing list [email protected] http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev
