> On Sept. 16, 2015, 4:39 p.m., Nilay Vaish wrote:
> > src/mem/request.hh, lines 309-311
> > <http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3028/diff/1/?file=48960#file48960line309>
> >
> >     Seems like the only way to set this variable is through the 
> > constructor.  Why not mark as const?

In http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3090/ I added optionally tracing virtual address 
which meant calling another Request constructor. That also meant I needed to 
set the inst. sequence number using a setter. A bit unfortunate but don't think 
it's worth changing the Request constructor or other methods.


- Radhika


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3028/#review7197
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Aug. 11, 2015, 9:05 p.m., Curtis Dunham wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3028/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Aug. 11, 2015, 9:05 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Default.
> 
> 
> Repository: gem5
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> This patch adds the instruction sequence number to the request and provides a
> request constructor that accepts a sequence number for initialization.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/mem/request.hh b998b5a6c5f59b41e0c0997ca1bebe37717ad551 
> 
> Diff: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3028/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Curtis Dunham
> 
>

_______________________________________________
gem5-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev

Reply via email to