> On Dec. 1, 2015, 5:35 p.m., Nilay Vaish wrote:
> > Ship It!

Thanks, I am making the reqInstSeqNum const in this patch (blocking out what 
#3090 intends to do). The patch will be refreshed soon anyways.


- Radhika


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3028/#review7657
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Aug. 11, 2015, 9:05 p.m., Curtis Dunham wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3028/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Aug. 11, 2015, 9:05 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Default.
> 
> 
> Repository: gem5
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> This patch adds the instruction sequence number to the request and provides a
> request constructor that accepts a sequence number for initialization.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/mem/request.hh b998b5a6c5f59b41e0c0997ca1bebe37717ad551 
> 
> Diff: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3028/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Curtis Dunham
> 
>

_______________________________________________
gem5-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev

Reply via email to