> On Jan. 13, 2016, 5:03 p.m., Tony Gutierrez wrote:
> > Thanks for fixing this up; it looks good to me now. It would also be nice 
> > to eventually make the interconnect event-based, as suggested, but I think 
> > that can wait for a future patch.

Thank you, you had done most of the work, I just fixed some small things ...


- Mohammad


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3230/#review7877
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Jan. 11, 2016, 5:58 a.m., Mohammad Alian wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3230/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Jan. 11, 2016, 5:58 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Default.
> 
> 
> Repository: gem5
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Changeset 11292:ed7527fcc338
> ---------------------------
> dist,dev: add an ethernet switch model
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/dev/net/Ethernet.py 9d2364203316 
>   src/dev/net/SConscript 9d2364203316 
>   src/dev/net/etherswitch.hh PRE-CREATION 
>   src/dev/net/etherswitch.cc PRE-CREATION 
> 
> Diff: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3230/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> several testing done with different benchmarks and different switch sizes
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Mohammad Alian
> 
>

_______________________________________________
gem5-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev

Reply via email to