> On juin 16, 2016, 2:37 après-midi, Jason Lowe-Power wrote:
> > Hi Sophiane,
> > 
> > Thanks for the contribution. It looks like some of the patch doesn't apply 
> > cleanly in reviewboard. Did you use the hg postreview extension? It may 
> > also help to use the "-o" option on the extension.
> > 
> > Cheers!

Hi Jason,

If I use the hg postreview extension (with the following command hg postreview 
-o -u -e 3502), all the patch does not apply cleanly.


- Sophiane


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3502/#review8413
-----------------------------------------------------------


On juin 16, 2016, 3:15 après-midi, Sophiane SENNI wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3502/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated juin 16, 2016, 3:15 après-midi)
> 
> 
> Review request for Default.
> 
> 
> Repository: gem5
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Changeset 10875:dd94e2606640
> ---------------------------
> cache: Split the hit latency into tag lookup latency and RAM access latency
> 
> If the cache access mode is parallel ("sequential_access" parameter set to 
> "False"), tags and RAMs are accessed in parallel. Therefore, the hit latency 
> is the maximum latency between tag lookup latency and RAM access latency. On 
> the other hand, if the cache access mode is sequential ("sequential_access" 
> parameter set to "True"), tags and RAM are accessed sequentially. Therefore, 
> the hit latency is the sum of tag lookup latency plus RAM access latency.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   configs/common/Caches.py 629fe6e6c781ec542bcd1cfda0217dfc51c4826b 
>   src/mem/cache/BaseCache.py 629fe6e6c781ec542bcd1cfda0217dfc51c4826b 
>   src/mem/cache/base.hh 629fe6e6c781ec542bcd1cfda0217dfc51c4826b 
>   src/mem/cache/base.cc 629fe6e6c781ec542bcd1cfda0217dfc51c4826b 
>   src/mem/cache/tags/Tags.py 629fe6e6c781ec542bcd1cfda0217dfc51c4826b 
>   src/mem/cache/tags/base.hh 629fe6e6c781ec542bcd1cfda0217dfc51c4826b 
>   src/mem/cache/tags/base.cc 629fe6e6c781ec542bcd1cfda0217dfc51c4826b 
>   src/mem/cache/tags/base_set_assoc.hh 
> 629fe6e6c781ec542bcd1cfda0217dfc51c4826b 
>   src/mem/cache/tags/fa_lru.hh 629fe6e6c781ec542bcd1cfda0217dfc51c4826b 
>   src/mem/cache/tags/fa_lru.cc 629fe6e6c781ec542bcd1cfda0217dfc51c4826b 
> 
> Diff: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3502/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Tested using --Debug-flags=Cache
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Sophiane SENNI
> 
>

_______________________________________________
gem5-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev

Reply via email to