Oh, I see. Do you think you can distribute the partial patch you have? Thank you.
Polina On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 4:48 PM, Gabriel Michael Black <gbl...@eecs.umich.edu > wrote: > Quoting Polina Dudnik <pdud...@gmail.com>: > > > On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 3:38 PM, Gabriel Michael Black < > gbl...@eecs.umich.edu > >> wrote: > > > >> There's actually a bug in the CPU wakeup code which prevents any CPU > >> that isn't activated and then suspended, like SPARCs APs which are > >> suspended directly, from waking up on interrupts, etc. I have a > >> partial fix which I've been using to work around the problem, but we > >> need to come up with a full solution. I don't know if this is what the > >> problem is, but it sounds like it could be. > >> > >> Gabe > > > > > > Are you talking about the seg fault in m5-stable that I get? Or the CPU > ids? > > > > Polina > > > > > > I was talking about the hang Ali described. If the BP is waiting for > an AP to tell it it's alive and the AP never wakes up, the system will > likely hang. I ran into that problem in X86_FS. > > Gabe > > _______________________________________________ > m5-dev mailing list > m5-dev@m5sim.org > http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev >
_______________________________________________ m5-dev mailing list m5-dev@m5sim.org http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev
