Oh, turns out we have the most recent version, the lab just had to fix the pointer to it.
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 2:57 PM, nathan binkert <n...@binkert.org> wrote: > If you want to get going quickly, you can download the scons-local > package and just stick it somewhere. > > Nate > > 2009/3/5 Polina Dudnik <pdud...@gmail.com>: > > Yes, I am trying to figure it out right now by running it withing gdb. It > is > > pretty interesting that my output only differs from yours by one line > which > > is segfault. > > > > It will be a little bit before I can install the most recent m5-dev > because > > the scons was upgraded to 0.98 and we are still on 0.97 and I need to > wait > > for the lab to upgrade scons. > > > > Polina > > > > On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 2:26 PM, Ali Saidi <sa...@umich.edu> wrote: > >> > >> My output looks like this: > >> M5 compiled Mar 5 2009 13:51:37 > >> M5 revision 632115b48346 5955 default qtip tip start_sparc_2cpu.diff > >> qbase > >> M5 started Mar 5 2009 14:03:22 > >> M5 executing on zeep > >> command line: ./build/SPARC_FS/m5.opt configs/example/fs.py -n 2 > >> Global frequency set at 1000000000000 ticks per second > >> info: No kernel set for full system simulation. Assuming you know what > >> you're doing... > >> Listening for t1000 connection on port 3456 > >> 0: system.t1000.htod: Real-time clock set to Thu Jan 1 > >> 00:00:00 2009 > >> > >> 0: system.t1000.htod: Real-time clock set to 1230768000 > >> Listening for t1000 connection on port 3457 > >> 0: system.remote_gdb.listener: listening for remote gdb #0 on port 7001 > >> 0: system.remote_gdb.listener: listening for remote gdb #1 on port 7000 > >> **** REAL SIMULATION **** > >> info: Entering event queue @ 0. Starting simulation... > >> hack: Processor 2 is virtual processor 4. Swizzle the numbers(this > >> will only work for <= 2 processors) > >> hack: Processor 2 is virtual processor 4. Swizzle the numbers(this > >> will only work for <= 2 processors) > >> info: Ignoring write to SPARC ERROR regsiter > >> info: Ignoring write to SPARC ERROR regsiter > >> warn: Don't know what interrupt to clear for console. > >> For more information see: http://www.m5sim.org/warn/7fe1004f > >> info: Ignoring write to SPARC ERROR regsiter > >> info: Ignoring write to SPARC ERROR regsiter > >> > >> > >> and the console output looks like: > >> cpu cpu > >> > >> Sun Fire T2000, No Keyboard > >> Copyright 2006 Sun Microsystems, Inc. All rights reserved. > >> OpenBoot 4.23.0, 256 MB memory available, Serial #1122867. > >> [saidi obp #30] > >> Ethernet address 0:80:3:de:ad:3, Host ID: 80112233. > >> > >> > >> > >> Boot device: /virtual-devices/d...@0 File and args: -vV > >> Loading ufs-file-system package 1.4 04 Aug 1995 13:02:54. > >> FCode UFS Reader 1.12 00/07/17 15:48:16. > >> Loading: /platform/SUNW,Sun-Fire-T2000/ufsboot > >> Loading: /platform/sun4v/ufsboot > >> device path '/virtual-devi...@100/d...@0:a' > >> The boot filesystem is logging. > >> The ufs log is empty and will not be used. > >> standalone = `kernel/sparcv9/unix', args = `-v' > >> Elf64 client > >> Size: 0x76e40+0x1c872+0x3123a Bytes > >> modpath: /platform/sun4v/kernel /kernel /usr/kernel > >> module /platform/sun4v/kernel/sparcv9/unix: text at [0x1000000, > >> 0x1076e3f] data at 0x1800000 > >> module misc/sparcv9/krtld: text at [0x1076e40, 0x108f737] data at > >> 0x184dab0 > >> module /platform/sun4v/kernel/sparcv9/genunix: text at [0x108f738, > >> 0x11dd437] data at 0x18531c0 > >> module /platform/sun4v/kernel/misc/sparcv9/platmod: text at > >> [0x11dd438, 0x11dd43f] data at 0x18a4be0 > >> module /platform/sun4v/kernel/cpu/sparcv9/SUNW,UltraSPARC-T1: text at > >> [0x11dd440, 0x11e06ff] data at 0x18a5300 > >> SunOS Release 5.10 Version Generic_118822-23 64-bit > >> Copyright 1983-2005 Sun Microsystems, Inc. All rights reserved. > >> Use is subject to license terms. > >> Ethernet address = 0:80:3:de:ad:3 > >> mem = 262144K (0x10000000) > >> avail mem = 237879296 > >> root nexus = Sun Fire T2000 > >> pseudo0 at root > >> pseudo0 is /pseudo > >> scsi_vhci0 at root > >> scsi_vhci0 is /scsi_vhci > >> virtual-device: hsimd0 > >> hsimd0 is /virtual-devi...@100/d...@0 > >> root on /virtual-devi...@100/d...@0:a fstype ufs > >> pseudo-device: dld0 > >> dld0 is /pseudo/d...@0 > >> cpu0: UltraSPARC-T1 (cpuid 0 clock 5 MHz) > >> cpu1: UltraSPARC-T1 (cpuid 1 clock 5 MHz) > >> > >> At this point there is no futher output. I imagine that one cpu is > >> waiting for another one or something and whatever condition it's > >> waiting for is not being reached. It is still interesting to know why > >> it's crashing for you, since it might shed some light on the reason. > >> The thing to do now is look through the solaris source to see what is > >> going on right after the cpuX: ... lines are printed and look at an > >> exec trace and try to debug the problem. > >> > >> Ali > >> > >> > >> > >> On Mar 5, 2009, at 2:30 PM, Polina Dudnik wrote: > >> > >> > It is m5-stable. Maybe I should change to m5. I can do that. > >> > > >> > > >> > Also, are any of the binaries dependent on 1g2p-md.bin or 1g2p- > >> > hv.bin by any chance? > >> > > >> > Polina > >> > > >> > > >> > On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 1:24 PM, Steve Reinhardt <ste...@gmail.com> > >> > wrote: > >> > m5 or m5-stable? The contextId change is in the former but not the > >> > latter. > >> > > >> > 2009/3/5 Polina Dudnik <pdud...@gmail.com>: > >> > > I am doing it in m5. > >> > > > >> > > Polina > >> > > > >> > > - Show quoted text - > >> > > On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 1:04 PM, Steve Reinhardt <ste...@gmail.com> > >> > wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >> - Show quoted text - > >> > >> 2009/3/5 Polina Dudnik <pdud...@gmail.com>: > >> > >> > I am not sure why our code base would be different and by how > >> > much, but > >> > >> > that > >> > >> > could be why yours is running fine and mine segfaults. > >> > >> > >> > >> Hi Polina, > >> > >> > >> > >> If you're doing this in the gem5 repository then that is getting > >> > stale > >> > >> wrt the main m5 tree. It might be best if all you're doing is > >> > working > >> > >> on SPARC functionality to do that based on the m5 tree. I really > >> > want > >> > >> to have a do-over on the gem5 tree and make it such that Ruby vs. > >> > the > >> > >> classic M5 memory system is a compile-time option so that we don't > >> > >> have to have a permanent fork like we do now. > >> > >> > >> > >> Steve > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> > >> m5-dev mailing list > >> > >> m5-dev@m5sim.org > >> > >> http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > _______________________________________________ > >> > > m5-dev mailing list > >> > > m5-dev@m5sim.org > >> > > http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev > >> > > > >> > > > >> > _______________________________________________ > >> > m5-dev mailing list > >> > m5-dev@m5sim.org > >> > http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev > >> > > >> > _______________________________________________ > >> > m5-dev mailing list > >> > m5-dev@m5sim.org > >> > http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> m5-dev mailing list > >> m5-dev@m5sim.org > >> http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > m5-dev mailing list > > m5-dev@m5sim.org > > http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev > > > > > _______________________________________________ > m5-dev mailing list > m5-dev@m5sim.org > http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev >
_______________________________________________ m5-dev mailing list m5-dev@m5sim.org http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev