Oh, turns out we have the most recent version, the lab just had to fix the
pointer to it.

On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 2:57 PM, nathan binkert <n...@binkert.org> wrote:

> If you want to get going quickly, you can download the scons-local
> package and just stick it somewhere.
>
>  Nate
>
> 2009/3/5 Polina Dudnik <pdud...@gmail.com>:
> > Yes, I am trying to figure it out right now by running it withing gdb. It
> is
> > pretty interesting that my output only differs from yours by one line
> which
> > is segfault.
> >
> > It will be a little bit before I can install the most recent m5-dev
> because
> > the scons was upgraded to 0.98 and we are still on 0.97 and I need to
> wait
> > for the lab to upgrade scons.
> >
> > Polina
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 2:26 PM, Ali Saidi <sa...@umich.edu> wrote:
> >>
> >> My output looks like this:
> >> M5 compiled Mar  5 2009 13:51:37
> >> M5 revision 632115b48346 5955 default qtip tip start_sparc_2cpu.diff
> >> qbase
> >> M5 started Mar  5 2009 14:03:22
> >> M5 executing on zeep
> >> command line: ./build/SPARC_FS/m5.opt configs/example/fs.py -n 2
> >> Global frequency set at 1000000000000 ticks per second
> >> info: No kernel set for full system simulation. Assuming you know what
> >> you're doing...
> >> Listening for t1000 connection on port 3456
> >>       0: system.t1000.htod: Real-time clock set to Thu Jan  1
> >> 00:00:00 2009
> >>
> >>       0: system.t1000.htod: Real-time clock set to 1230768000
> >> Listening for t1000 connection on port 3457
> >> 0: system.remote_gdb.listener: listening for remote gdb #0 on port 7001
> >> 0: system.remote_gdb.listener: listening for remote gdb #1 on port 7000
> >> **** REAL SIMULATION ****
> >> info: Entering event queue @ 0.  Starting simulation...
> >> hack: Processor 2 is virtual processor 4. Swizzle the numbers(this
> >> will only work for <= 2 processors)
> >> hack: Processor 2 is virtual processor 4. Swizzle the numbers(this
> >> will only work for <= 2 processors)
> >> info: Ignoring write to SPARC ERROR regsiter
> >> info: Ignoring write to SPARC ERROR regsiter
> >> warn: Don't know what interrupt to clear for console.
> >> For more information see: http://www.m5sim.org/warn/7fe1004f
> >> info: Ignoring write to SPARC ERROR regsiter
> >> info: Ignoring write to SPARC ERROR regsiter
> >>
> >>
> >> and the console output looks like:
> >> cpu cpu
> >>
> >> Sun Fire T2000, No Keyboard
> >> Copyright 2006 Sun Microsystems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
> >> OpenBoot 4.23.0, 256 MB memory available, Serial #1122867.
> >> [saidi obp #30]
> >> Ethernet address 0:80:3:de:ad:3, Host ID: 80112233.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Boot device: /virtual-devices/d...@0  File and args: -vV
> >> Loading ufs-file-system package 1.4 04 Aug 1995 13:02:54.
> >> FCode UFS Reader 1.12 00/07/17 15:48:16.
> >> Loading: /platform/SUNW,Sun-Fire-T2000/ufsboot
> >> Loading: /platform/sun4v/ufsboot
> >> device path '/virtual-devi...@100/d...@0:a'
> >> The boot filesystem is logging.
> >> The ufs log is empty and will not be used.
> >> standalone = `kernel/sparcv9/unix', args = `-v'
> >> Elf64 client
> >> Size: 0x76e40+0x1c872+0x3123a Bytes
> >> modpath: /platform/sun4v/kernel /kernel /usr/kernel
> >> module /platform/sun4v/kernel/sparcv9/unix: text at [0x1000000,
> >> 0x1076e3f] data at 0x1800000
> >> module misc/sparcv9/krtld: text at [0x1076e40, 0x108f737] data at
> >> 0x184dab0
> >> module /platform/sun4v/kernel/sparcv9/genunix: text at [0x108f738,
> >> 0x11dd437] data at 0x18531c0
> >> module /platform/sun4v/kernel/misc/sparcv9/platmod: text at
> >> [0x11dd438, 0x11dd43f] data at 0x18a4be0
> >> module /platform/sun4v/kernel/cpu/sparcv9/SUNW,UltraSPARC-T1: text at
> >> [0x11dd440, 0x11e06ff] data at 0x18a5300
> >> SunOS Release 5.10 Version Generic_118822-23 64-bit
> >> Copyright 1983-2005 Sun Microsystems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
> >> Use is subject to license terms.
> >> Ethernet address = 0:80:3:de:ad:3
> >> mem = 262144K (0x10000000)
> >> avail mem = 237879296
> >> root nexus = Sun Fire T2000
> >> pseudo0 at root
> >> pseudo0 is /pseudo
> >> scsi_vhci0 at root
> >> scsi_vhci0 is /scsi_vhci
> >> virtual-device: hsimd0
> >> hsimd0 is /virtual-devi...@100/d...@0
> >> root on /virtual-devi...@100/d...@0:a fstype ufs
> >> pseudo-device: dld0
> >> dld0 is /pseudo/d...@0
> >> cpu0: UltraSPARC-T1 (cpuid 0 clock 5 MHz)
> >> cpu1: UltraSPARC-T1 (cpuid 1 clock 5 MHz)
> >>
> >> At this point there is no futher output. I imagine that one cpu is
> >> waiting for another  one or something and whatever condition it's
> >> waiting for is not being reached. It is still interesting to know why
> >> it's crashing for you, since it might shed some light on the reason.
> >> The thing to do now is look through the solaris  source to see what is
> >> going on right after the cpuX: ... lines are printed and look at an
> >> exec trace and try to debug the problem.
> >>
> >> Ali
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Mar 5, 2009, at 2:30 PM, Polina Dudnik wrote:
> >>
> >> > It is m5-stable. Maybe I should change to m5. I can do that.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Also, are any of the binaries dependent on 1g2p-md.bin or 1g2p-
> >> > hv.bin by any chance?
> >> >
> >> > Polina
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 1:24 PM, Steve Reinhardt <ste...@gmail.com>
> >> > wrote:
> >> > m5 or m5-stable?  The contextId change is in the former but not the
> >> > latter.
> >> >
> >> > 2009/3/5 Polina Dudnik <pdud...@gmail.com>:
> >> > > I am doing it in m5.
> >> > >
> >> > > Polina
> >> > >
> >> > > - Show quoted text -
> >> > > On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 1:04 PM, Steve Reinhardt <ste...@gmail.com>
> >> > wrote:
> >> > >>
> >> > >> - Show quoted text -
> >> > >> 2009/3/5 Polina Dudnik <pdud...@gmail.com>:
> >> > >> > I am not sure why our code base would be different and by how
> >> > much, but
> >> > >> > that
> >> > >> > could be why yours is running fine and mine segfaults.
> >> > >>
> >> > >> Hi Polina,
> >> > >>
> >> > >> If you're doing this in the gem5 repository then that is getting
> >> > stale
> >> > >> wrt the main m5 tree.  It might be best if all you're doing is
> >> > working
> >> > >> on SPARC functionality to do that based on the m5 tree.  I really
> >> > want
> >> > >> to have a do-over on the gem5 tree and make it such that Ruby vs.
> >> > the
> >> > >> classic M5 memory system is a compile-time option so that we don't
> >> > >> have to have a permanent fork like we do now.
> >> > >>
> >> > >> Steve
> >> > >> _______________________________________________
> >> > >> m5-dev mailing list
> >> > >> m5-dev@m5sim.org
> >> > >> http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > _______________________________________________
> >> > > m5-dev mailing list
> >> > > m5-dev@m5sim.org
> >> > > http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> > m5-dev mailing list
> >> > m5-dev@m5sim.org
> >> > http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev
> >> >
> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> > m5-dev mailing list
> >> > m5-dev@m5sim.org
> >> > http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> m5-dev mailing list
> >> m5-dev@m5sim.org
> >> http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > m5-dev mailing list
> > m5-dev@m5sim.org
> > http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> m5-dev mailing list
> m5-dev@m5sim.org
> http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev
>
_______________________________________________
m5-dev mailing list
m5-dev@m5sim.org
http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev

Reply via email to