On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 3:38 PM, Gabriel Michael Black <gbl...@eecs.umich.edu
> wrote:

> There's actually a bug in the CPU wakeup code which prevents any CPU
> that isn't activated and then suspended, like SPARCs APs which are
> suspended directly, from waking up on interrupts, etc. I have a
> partial fix which I've been using to work around the problem, but we
> need to come up with a full solution. I don't know if this is what the
> problem is, but it sounds like it could be.
>
> Gabe


Are you talking about the seg fault in m5-stable that I get? Or the CPU ids?

Polina


>
>
> Quoting Ali Saidi <sa...@umich.edu>:
>
> > My output looks like this:
> > M5 compiled Mar  5 2009 13:51:37
> > M5 revision 632115b48346 5955 default qtip tip start_sparc_2cpu.diff
> > qbase
> > M5 started Mar  5 2009 14:03:22
> > M5 executing on zeep
> > command line: ./build/SPARC_FS/m5.opt configs/example/fs.py -n 2
> > Global frequency set at 1000000000000 ticks per second
> > info: No kernel set for full system simulation. Assuming you know what
> > you're doing...
> > Listening for t1000 connection on port 3456
> >        0: system.t1000.htod: Real-time clock set to Thu Jan  1
> > 00:00:00 2009
> >
> >        0: system.t1000.htod: Real-time clock set to 1230768000
> > Listening for t1000 connection on port 3457
> > 0: system.remote_gdb.listener: listening for remote gdb #0 on port 7001
> > 0: system.remote_gdb.listener: listening for remote gdb #1 on port 7000
> > **** REAL SIMULATION ****
> > info: Entering event queue @ 0.  Starting simulation...
> > hack: Processor 2 is virtual processor 4. Swizzle the numbers(this
> > will only work for <= 2 processors)
> > hack: Processor 2 is virtual processor 4. Swizzle the numbers(this
> > will only work for <= 2 processors)
> > info: Ignoring write to SPARC ERROR regsiter
> > info: Ignoring write to SPARC ERROR regsiter
> > warn: Don't know what interrupt to clear for console.
> > For more information see: http://www.m5sim.org/warn/7fe1004f
> > info: Ignoring write to SPARC ERROR regsiter
> > info: Ignoring write to SPARC ERROR regsiter
> >
> >
> > and the console output looks like:
> > cpu cpu
> >
> > Sun Fire T2000, No Keyboard
> > Copyright 2006 Sun Microsystems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
> > OpenBoot 4.23.0, 256 MB memory available, Serial #1122867.
> > [saidi obp #30]
> > Ethernet address 0:80:3:de:ad:3, Host ID: 80112233.
> >
> >
> >
> > Boot device: /virtual-devices/d...@0  File and args: -vV
> > Loading ufs-file-system package 1.4 04 Aug 1995 13:02:54.
> > FCode UFS Reader 1.12 00/07/17 15:48:16.
> > Loading: /platform/SUNW,Sun-Fire-T2000/ufsboot
> > Loading: /platform/sun4v/ufsboot
> > device path '/virtual-devi...@100/d...@0:a'
> > The boot filesystem is logging.
> > The ufs log is empty and will not be used.
> > standalone = `kernel/sparcv9/unix', args = `-v'
> > Elf64 client
> > Size: 0x76e40+0x1c872+0x3123a Bytes
> > modpath: /platform/sun4v/kernel /kernel /usr/kernel
> > module /platform/sun4v/kernel/sparcv9/unix: text at [0x1000000,
> > 0x1076e3f] data at 0x1800000
> > module misc/sparcv9/krtld: text at [0x1076e40, 0x108f737] data at
> > 0x184dab0
> > module /platform/sun4v/kernel/sparcv9/genunix: text at [0x108f738,
> > 0x11dd437] data at 0x18531c0
> > module /platform/sun4v/kernel/misc/sparcv9/platmod: text at
> > [0x11dd438, 0x11dd43f] data at 0x18a4be0
> > module /platform/sun4v/kernel/cpu/sparcv9/SUNW,UltraSPARC-T1: text at
> > [0x11dd440, 0x11e06ff] data at 0x18a5300
> > SunOS Release 5.10 Version Generic_118822-23 64-bit
> > Copyright 1983-2005 Sun Microsystems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
> > Use is subject to license terms.
> > Ethernet address = 0:80:3:de:ad:3
> > mem = 262144K (0x10000000)
> > avail mem = 237879296
> > root nexus = Sun Fire T2000
> > pseudo0 at root
> > pseudo0 is /pseudo
> > scsi_vhci0 at root
> > scsi_vhci0 is /scsi_vhci
> > virtual-device: hsimd0
> > hsimd0 is /virtual-devi...@100/d...@0
> > root on /virtual-devi...@100/d...@0:a fstype ufs
> > pseudo-device: dld0
> > dld0 is /pseudo/d...@0
> > cpu0: UltraSPARC-T1 (cpuid 0 clock 5 MHz)
> > cpu1: UltraSPARC-T1 (cpuid 1 clock 5 MHz)
> >
> > At this point there is no futher output. I imagine that one cpu is
> > waiting for another  one or something and whatever condition it's
> > waiting for is not being reached. It is still interesting to know why
> > it's crashing for you, since it might shed some light on the reason.
> > The thing to do now is look through the solaris  source to see what is
> > going on right after the cpuX: ... lines are printed and look at an
> > exec trace and try to debug the problem.
> >
> > Ali
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mar 5, 2009, at 2:30 PM, Polina Dudnik wrote:
> >
> >> It is m5-stable. Maybe I should change to m5. I can do that.
> >>
> >>
> >> Also, are any of the binaries dependent on 1g2p-md.bin or 1g2p-
> >> hv.bin by any chance?
> >>
> >> Polina
> >>
> >>
> >> On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 1:24 PM, Steve Reinhardt <ste...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> m5 or m5-stable?  The contextId change is in the former but not the
> >> latter.
> >>
> >> 2009/3/5 Polina Dudnik <pdud...@gmail.com>:
> >> > I am doing it in m5.
> >> >
> >> > Polina
> >> >
> >> > - Show quoted text -
> >> > On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 1:04 PM, Steve Reinhardt <ste...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> - Show quoted text -
> >> >> 2009/3/5 Polina Dudnik <pdud...@gmail.com>:
> >> >> > I am not sure why our code base would be different and by how
> >> much, but
> >> >> > that
> >> >> > could be why yours is running fine and mine segfaults.
> >> >>
> >> >> Hi Polina,
> >> >>
> >> >> If you're doing this in the gem5 repository then that is getting
> >> stale
> >> >> wrt the main m5 tree.  It might be best if all you're doing is
> >> working
> >> >> on SPARC functionality to do that based on the m5 tree.  I really
> >> want
> >> >> to have a do-over on the gem5 tree and make it such that Ruby vs.
> >> the
> >> >> classic M5 memory system is a compile-time option so that we don't
> >> >> have to have a permanent fork like we do now.
> >> >>
> >> >> Steve
> >> >> _______________________________________________
> >> >> m5-dev mailing list
> >> >> m5-dev@m5sim.org
> >> >> http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> > m5-dev mailing list
> >> > m5-dev@m5sim.org
> >> > http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev
> >> >
> >> >
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> m5-dev mailing list
> >> m5-dev@m5sim.org
> >> http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> m5-dev mailing list
> >> m5-dev@m5sim.org
> >> http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > m5-dev mailing list
> > m5-dev@m5sim.org
> > http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> m5-dev mailing list
> m5-dev@m5sim.org
> http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev
>
_______________________________________________
m5-dev mailing list
m5-dev@m5sim.org
http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev

Reply via email to