On Thu, January 24, 2013 4:01 pm, Rodrigo Reynolds Ramírez wrote: > > I checked the config.ini and the latency in [system.physmem] are > different. I don't know how to compare the performance of the execution of > both programs. > >> Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2013 13:58:39 -0600 >> Subject: Re: [gem5-users] About statistics >> From: [email protected] >> To: [email protected] >> CC: [email protected] >> >> On Thu, January 24, 2013 8:59 am, Rodrigo Reynolds Ramírez wrote: >> > >> > Hello everyone: >> > I am trying to compare different memories architectures, my system is >> > finally working. But now I have a little problem, I don't see any >> measure >> > about performance like time, op/s or something like that in the >> stats.txt. >> > Actually I change the main memory latency but I don't see any relevant >> > change in the results. As well as the miss rate which other measure of >> > performance could I use? >> >> Is the file config.ini from the two runs (before and after changing the >> latency of the memory) same or different? >>
Did your simulation actually run? Because the topmost statistic listed in the file stats.txt, which is sim_seconds, denotes the time spent in the simulated system for the simulation. -- Nilay _______________________________________________ gem5-users mailing list [email protected] http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users
