I think my simulation finish satisfactorily, when it finishes I get this
message:
Exiting @ tick 3822080322000 because target called exit()
and in both cases I get the same result in stats.txtsim_seconds
3.822080
and the simulations takes a lot of timehost_seconds
4091.93
I am running gcc from spec2006 with train inputs
Rodrigo
> Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2013 18:17:54 -0600
> Subject: Re: [gem5-users] About statistics
> From: [email protected]
> To: [email protected]
> CC: [email protected]
>
> On Thu, January 24, 2013 4:01 pm, Rodrigo Reynolds Ramírez wrote:
> >
> > I checked the config.ini and the latency in [system.physmem] are
> > different. I don't know how to compare the performance of the execution of
> > both programs.
> >
> >> Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2013 13:58:39 -0600
> >> Subject: Re: [gem5-users] About statistics
> >> From: [email protected]
> >> To: [email protected]
> >> CC: [email protected]
> >>
> >> On Thu, January 24, 2013 8:59 am, Rodrigo Reynolds Ramírez wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Hello everyone:
> >> > I am trying to compare different memories architectures, my system is
> >> > finally working. But now I have a little problem, I don't see any
> >> measure
> >> > about performance like time, op/s or something like that in the
> >> stats.txt.
> >> > Actually I change the main memory latency but I don't see any relevant
> >> > change in the results. As well as the miss rate which other measure of
> >> > performance could I use?
> >>
> >> Is the file config.ini from the two runs (before and after changing the
> >> latency of the memory) same or different?
> >>
>
> Did your simulation actually run? Because the topmost statistic listed in
> the file stats.txt, which is sim_seconds, denotes the time spent in the
> simulated system for the simulation.
>
> --
> Nilay
>
_______________________________________________
gem5-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users
