Hello,

In my se.py file, if you don't set the --cpu-type option, the default is
atomic cpu. So, no timing!

Regards,

--
Fernando A. Endo, PhD student and researcher

Université de Grenoble, UJF
France



2013/1/25 Rodrigo Reynolds Ramírez <[email protected]>

>  I added the -s option to execution line, after include se.py and I see
> differences into the execution time, I tried it with the helloWorld test. I
> also tried gcc but after 3,5h the execution has not finished, is it normal?
> without the -s option it takes around 1,5h but I don't have any performance
> measure.
>
> Rodrigo
>
> ------------------------------
> From: [email protected]
> To: [email protected]
> Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2013 13:15:05 +0000
>
> Subject: Re: [gem5-users] About statistics
>
>  I think I am using timing.
>
> I compiled the simulator with:
> scons build/X86/gem5.opt
>
> an run the benchmark using these command:
> ./build/X86/gem5.opt configs/example/se.py --caches --l1d_size=32kB
> --l1i_size=32kB --l2cache --l2_size=256kB
>  
> --cmd=/scratch/rodri/spec2006/benchspec/CPU2006/403.gcc/run/run_base_train_rrr-static-gcc45-64bit.0000/gcc_base.rrr-static-gcc45-64bit
> --input=/scratch/rodri/spec2006/benchspec/CPU2006/403.gcc/run/run_base_train_rrr-static-gcc45-64bit.0000/
> integrate.in --option=" -o m5out/bench.s" --output=m5out/bench.out
> --errout=m5out/bench.err
>
> For a real measure of performance do I need to use the -s option for se.py?
>
> > From: [email protected]
> > To: [email protected]
> > Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2013 13:01:36 +0000
> > Subject: Re: [gem5-users] About statistics
> >
> > Atomic or timing?
> >
> > From: Rodrigo Reynolds Ram�rez <[email protected]<mailto:
> [email protected]>>
> > Reply-To: gem5 users mailing list <[email protected]<mailto:
> [email protected]>>
> > Date: Friday, 25 January 2013 12:26
> > To: gem5-users <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
> > Subject: Re: [gem5-users] About statistics
> >
> > I am changing the latency of the simple memory in se.py, I changed the
> line in this way:
> >
> > first case:
> > physmem = SimpleMemory(range=AddrRange("512MB"),latency="1000ns")
> >
> > second case:
> > physmem = SimpleMemory(range=AddrRange("512MB"),latency="30ns")
> >
> > I checked config.ini and the change is done but the results in stats.txt
> are unchanged. I am using gem5-stable-f75ee4849c40.
> >
> > Rodrigo
> >
> > > Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2013 05:59:10 -0600
> > > Subject: Re: [gem5-users] About statistics
> > > From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
> > > To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
> > > CC: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
> > >
> > > On Thu, January 24, 2013 6:44 pm, Rodrigo Reynolds Ram�rez wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I think my simulation finish satisfactorily, when it finishes I get
> this
> > > > message:
> > > > Exiting @ tick 3822080322000 because target called exit()
> > > > and in both cases I get the same result in stats.txtsim_seconds
> > > > 3.822080
> > > > and the simulations takes a lot of timehost_seconds
> > > > 4091.93
> > > >
> > > > I am running gcc from spec2006 with train inputs
> > >
> > > It is hard to believe that the run time would not change on changing
> the
> > > latency of the memory. Can you mention exactly the parameter you
> changed
> > > between the two simulations?
> > >
> > > --
> > > Nilay
> > >
> >
> > -- IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are
> confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended
> recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the
> contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the
> information in any medium. Thank you.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > gem5-users mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users
>
> _______________________________________________ gem5-users mailing list
> [email protected] http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users
>
> _______________________________________________
> gem5-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users
>
_______________________________________________
gem5-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users

Reply via email to