I think I am using timing.
I compiled the simulator with:scons build/X86/gem5.opt
an run the benchmark using these command:./build/X86/gem5.opt 
configs/example/se.py --caches --l1d_size=32kB --l1i_size=32kB --l2cache 
--l2_size=256kB  
--cmd=/scratch/rodri/spec2006/benchspec/CPU2006/403.gcc/run/run_base_train_rrr-static-gcc45-64bit.0000/gcc_base.rrr-static-gcc45-64bit
 
--input=/scratch/rodri/spec2006/benchspec/CPU2006/403.gcc/run/run_base_train_rrr-static-gcc45-64bit.0000/integrate.in
 --option=" -o m5out/bench.s" --output=m5out/bench.out --errout=m5out/bench.err

For a real measure of performance do I need to use the -s option for se.py?

> From: [email protected]
> To: [email protected]
> Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2013 13:01:36 +0000
> Subject: Re: [gem5-users] About statistics
> 
> Atomic or timing?
> 
> From: Rodrigo Reynolds Ram�rez 
> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
> Reply-To: gem5 users mailing list 
> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
> Date: Friday, 25 January 2013 12:26
> To: gem5-users <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
> Subject: Re: [gem5-users] About statistics
> 
> I am changing the latency of the simple memory in se.py, I changed the line 
> in this way:
> 
> first case:
> physmem = SimpleMemory(range=AddrRange("512MB"),latency="1000ns")
> 
> second case:
> physmem = SimpleMemory(range=AddrRange("512MB"),latency="30ns")
> 
> I checked config.ini and the change is done but the results in stats.txt are 
> unchanged. I am using gem5-stable-f75ee4849c40.
> 
> Rodrigo
> 
> > Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2013 05:59:10 -0600
> > Subject: Re: [gem5-users] About statistics
> > From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
> > To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
> > CC: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
> >
> > On Thu, January 24, 2013 6:44 pm, Rodrigo Reynolds Ram�rez wrote:
> > >
> > > I think my simulation finish satisfactorily, when it finishes I get this
> > > message:
> > > Exiting @ tick 3822080322000 because target called exit()
> > > and in both cases I get the same result in stats.txtsim_seconds
> > > 3.822080
> > > and the simulations takes a lot of timehost_seconds
> > > 4091.93
> > >
> > > I am running gcc from spec2006 with train inputs
> >
> > It is hard to believe that the run time would not change on changing the
> > latency of the memory. Can you mention exactly the parameter you changed
> > between the two simulations?
> >
> > --
> > Nilay
> >
> 
> -- IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are 
> confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended 
> recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the 
> contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the 
> information in any medium. Thank you.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> gem5-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users
                                          
_______________________________________________
gem5-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users

Reply via email to