Jonathan, That looks fine. The boilerplate will certainly be updated during editing; those of us who use the xml2rfc tool to generate drafts are accustomed to the tool producing correct boilerplate automatically.
Regards Brian Carpenter On 2011-02-18 07:29, Herzog, Jonathan - 0668 - MITLL wrote: > On Feb 6, 2011, at 7:35 PM, Brian E Carpenter wrote: > >> Please see attached review. > > > Before I incorporate these comments into the document, I thought I'd describe > our proposed changes: > >> Minor issues >> ------------ >> >> [SEC1] Brown, D., "Standards for Efficient Cryptography 1 (SEC >> 1)", Standards for Efficient Cryptography 1, May 2009. >> >> This may be a well known reference for practitioners, but it doesn't seem >> to be a sufficient citation for a normative reference. Google can't even find >> it. If it is meant to be the same thing as reference [SEC1] in RFC 5480, >> please cite it in the same way; Google can find that one and the IESG has >> already accepted it as a normative reference. > > > Good call. I will change the reference to match that in RFC 5480: > > [SEC1] Standards for Efficient Cryptography Group (SECG), "SEC > 1: Elliptic Curve Cryptography", Version 2.0, May 2009. > > > >> Nit >> --- >> >> == You're using the IETF Trust Provisions' Section 6.b License Notice from >> 12 Sep 2009 rather than the newer Notice from 28 Dec 2009. (See >> http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info/) >> > > I was advised to leave this alone, as the RFC editor would update the notice > when it gets published. > > > > Would these edits address your concerns? > > Thanks. > > > -- > Jonathan Herzog voice: > (781) 981-2356 > Technical Staff fax: > (781) 981-7687 > Cyber Systems and Technology Group email: [email protected] > MIT Lincoln Laboratory www: > http://www.ll.mit.edu/CST/ > 244 Wood Street > Lexington, MA 02420-9185 > _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
