Incorparated the change into the document. Thanks to Jari.

Weiming
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Joel M. Halpern" <[email protected]>

> Seems like an improvement to me.
> Yours,
> Joel
> 
> On 3/27/2013 2:56 AM, Jari Arkko wrote:
>> Thanks for the review, Meral! Authors, can you consider the suggested edit?
>>
>> Jari
>>
>> On Mar 23, 2013, at 8:21 PM, Meral Shirazipour 
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Section 11, the following sentence can be written :
>>> "The ForCES protocol document [RFC5810] includes a comprehensive set of 
>>> security mechanisms and which implementations are required to support, and 
>>> which deployments can use to meet these needs."
>>> Suggestion:
>>> "The ForCES protocol document [RFC5810] includes a comprehensive set of 
>>> security mechanisms that implementations are required to support to meet 
>>> these needs."
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Gen-art mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
>>
_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Reply via email to