I've copied the RFC Editor to let her weigh in. My assumption is that sort of 
stuff is what the RFC Editor does -- edit. Let them have at it. It will delay 
publication a little, but not as much as asking you to reformat everything. 

On Sep 17, 2013, at 6:34 AM, Lorenzo Miniero <[email protected]> wrote:

> Sorry for this delay, I've been a bit busy.
> 
> I have made those changes Brian and others suggested (Mealy, AS as
> Application Server), but apparently the xml.resource.org got a bit
> stricter in a few parts: the resulting draft now has a lot of lines
> that go beyond the 72 characters limit for lines, apparently because the
> default left margin has been moved.
> 
> Fixing this would require quite a lot of changes in formatting: is there
> some way the RFC editor can take care of those small changes without
> requiring this, or should we adapt the draft before submitting the new
> version?
> 
> Thanks,
> Lorenzo 
> 
> 
> Il giorno Fri, 13 Sep 2013 07:56:58 +1200
> Brian E Carpenter <[email protected]> ha scritto:
> 
>>>> Would it
>>>> be ok to add the "finite state automaton" in brackets after the
>>>> text where "Mealy automaton" is first introduced?
>> 
>> That would be fine for me.
>> 
>> Regards
>>   Brian
>> 
>> On 12/09/2013 21:41, Jari Arkko wrote:
>>> Brian: Thank you for your review, and thank you Lorenzo for taking
>>> these comments into account. I have balloted No-Objection for this
>>> document.
>>> 
>>> jari
>>> 
>>> On Sep 9, 2013, at 6:08 PM, Lorenzo Miniero <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Brian,
>>>> 
>>>> thanks for the review! We'll add those elements to the terminology
>>>> section.
>>>> 
>>>> About the "Mealy automaton", rather than adding a reference to
>>>> pages like Wikipedia, I'd go for an inline indication to the
>>>> reader. Would it be ok to add the "finite state automaton" in
>>>> brackets after the text where "Mealy automaton" is first
>>>> introduced?
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Lorenzo 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Il giorno Sun, 08 Sep 2013 13:05:55 +1200
>>>> Brian E Carpenter <[email protected]> ha scritto:
>>>> 
>>>>> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background
>>>>> on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
>>>>> http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before
>>>>> posting a new version of the draft.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Document: draft-ietf-mediactrl-call-flows-13.txt (Informational)
>>>>> Reviewer: Brian Carpenter
>>>>> Review Date: 2013-09-08
>>>>> IETF LC End Date: 2013-09-03
>>>>> IESG Telechat date: 2013-09-12
>>>>> 
>>>>> Summary:  Ready
>>>>> --------
>>>>> 
>>>>> Comment:
>>>>> --------
>>>>> 
>>>>> This is a massive (175pp) and highly specialised document, for
>>>>> which a generalist review is pretty much useless. I have not
>>>>> checked the example flows, XML extracts, etc. IMHO, we have to
>>>>> trust the authors and the WG in a case like this.
>>>>> 
>>>>> The document is clear and where I have sampled the text in the
>>>>> examples it is up to standard.
>>>>> 
>>>>> This review is the same as for Last Call; my comments are just
>>>>> editorial suggestions.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Editorial:
>>>>> ----------
>>>>> 
>>>>> There are a few abbreviations (AS, MS, CFW) that could usefully be
>>>>> included in the Terminology section.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Also, AS is widely used in the IETF to mean Autonomous System.
>>>>> Some readers might be confused at first, so this should be stated
>>>>> very clearly.
>>>>> 
>>>>> "Mealy automaton" (section 4.1) needs a reference. Or it might be
>>>>> sufficient just to say "finite state automaton."
>>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Gen-art mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
>>> 
>>> 
> 

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Reply via email to