You can also try with http://xml.resource.org/old.html

Regards
   Brian Carpenter
   http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7924-6182




On 18/09/2013 00:07, Eric Burger wrote:
> I've copied the RFC Editor to let her weigh in. My assumption is that sort of 
> stuff is what the RFC Editor does -- edit. Let them have at it. It will delay 
> publication a little, but not as much as asking you to reformat everything. 
> 
> On Sep 17, 2013, at 6:34 AM, Lorenzo Miniero <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> Sorry for this delay, I've been a bit busy.
>>
>> I have made those changes Brian and others suggested (Mealy, AS as
>> Application Server), but apparently the xml.resource.org got a bit
>> stricter in a few parts: the resulting draft now has a lot of lines
>> that go beyond the 72 characters limit for lines, apparently because the
>> default left margin has been moved.
>>
>> Fixing this would require quite a lot of changes in formatting: is there
>> some way the RFC editor can take care of those small changes without
>> requiring this, or should we adapt the draft before submitting the new
>> version?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Lorenzo 
>>
>>
>> Il giorno Fri, 13 Sep 2013 07:56:58 +1200
>> Brian E Carpenter <[email protected]> ha scritto:
>>
>>>>> Would it
>>>>> be ok to add the "finite state automaton" in brackets after the
>>>>> text where "Mealy automaton" is first introduced?
>>> That would be fine for me.
>>>
>>> Regards
>>>   Brian
>>>
>>> On 12/09/2013 21:41, Jari Arkko wrote:
>>>> Brian: Thank you for your review, and thank you Lorenzo for taking
>>>> these comments into account. I have balloted No-Objection for this
>>>> document.
>>>>
>>>> jari
>>>>
>>>> On Sep 9, 2013, at 6:08 PM, Lorenzo Miniero <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Brian,
>>>>>
>>>>> thanks for the review! We'll add those elements to the terminology
>>>>> section.
>>>>>
>>>>> About the "Mealy automaton", rather than adding a reference to
>>>>> pages like Wikipedia, I'd go for an inline indication to the
>>>>> reader. Would it be ok to add the "finite state automaton" in
>>>>> brackets after the text where "Mealy automaton" is first
>>>>> introduced?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Lorenzo 
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Il giorno Sun, 08 Sep 2013 13:05:55 +1200
>>>>> Brian E Carpenter <[email protected]> ha scritto:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background
>>>>>> on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
>>>>>> http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before
>>>>>> posting a new version of the draft.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Document: draft-ietf-mediactrl-call-flows-13.txt (Informational)
>>>>>> Reviewer: Brian Carpenter
>>>>>> Review Date: 2013-09-08
>>>>>> IETF LC End Date: 2013-09-03
>>>>>> IESG Telechat date: 2013-09-12
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Summary:  Ready
>>>>>> --------
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Comment:
>>>>>> --------
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This is a massive (175pp) and highly specialised document, for
>>>>>> which a generalist review is pretty much useless. I have not
>>>>>> checked the example flows, XML extracts, etc. IMHO, we have to
>>>>>> trust the authors and the WG in a case like this.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The document is clear and where I have sampled the text in the
>>>>>> examples it is up to standard.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This review is the same as for Last Call; my comments are just
>>>>>> editorial suggestions.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Editorial:
>>>>>> ----------
>>>>>>
>>>>>> There are a few abbreviations (AS, MS, CFW) that could usefully be
>>>>>> included in the Terminology section.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Also, AS is widely used in the IETF to mean Autonomous System.
>>>>>> Some readers might be confused at first, so this should be stated
>>>>>> very clearly.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Mealy automaton" (section 4.1) needs a reference. Or it might be
>>>>>> sufficient just to say "finite state automaton."
>>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Gen-art mailing list
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
>>>>
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gen-art mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Reply via email to