Thanks for your review, Tom. Authors, is there an answer to Tom’s question?
jari On 17 Jun 2015, at 22:15, Tom Taylor <[email protected]> wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on > Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at > > <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > > Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments > you may receive. > > Document: draft-ietf-sipcore-6665-clarification-00 > Reviewer: Tom Taylor > Review Date: 17 June 2015 > IETF LC End Date: 17 June 2015 > IESG Telechat date: 25 June 2015 > > Summary: This is a very short document expanding on a sentence in RFC 6665 to > make clear the requirements surrounding use of GRUUs in the SIP event > framework. It is probably good to go except for a minor issue of terminology > that needs clarification. The reviewer apologizes for not being current on > that terminology if it is a matter of common usage. > > Major issues: None. > > Minor issues: The term "local target" is used in the text (and in RFC 6665. > RFC 3261 speaks of a remote target, but not a local one. In which document is > "local target" defined? > > Nits/editorial comments: None. > > _______________________________________________ > Gen-art mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
