Thank you very much for your review, Dan. Authors, have you taken a look at Dan’s comments?
Jari On 25 Nov 2016, at 14:16, Dan Romascanu <droma...@gmail.com> wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed > by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your > document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. > > For more information, please see the FAQ at > > <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > > Document: > > draft-ietf-siprec-callflows-07 > > Reviewer: Dan Romascanu > Review Date: 11/25/16 > IETF LC End Date: 11/27/16 > IESG Telechat date: (if known) 12/2/16 > > Summary: Ready. > > This is a very useful supporting document in the SIPREC cluster. > > Major issues: > > None > > Minor issues: > > None > > > Nits/editorial comments: > > 1. The title is slightly misleading, as the document does not have as goal to > document all or the most important call flows, but rather to provide a > grouping of significant examples. 'Examples of SUP Recording Call Flows' may > have been a better title. > > 2. As the document uses terminology defined in [RFC7865] and [RFC6341], > listing these two RFCs as Normative References seems necessary (can't > understand the terms without reading the two RFCs) > > 3. typo in the Securoty Considerations section: ' > > Security considerations mentioned in [RFC7865] and [RFC7866] has to be > followed ... > > s/has to/have to/ > > _______________________________________________ > Gen-art mailing list > Genfirstname.lastname@example.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list Genemail@example.com https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art