One problem with Oppose in that electoral system is that unlike say RFA you 
don't know why individual people are opposing, though you can make deductions 
from patterns. For example, as one might have expected the tension between the 
WMF and the community over the last two years resulted in a lot of oppose votes 
for incumbents.

I would like to hope we don't have anyone who simply opposes or indeed supports 
based on gender, but one of the drawbacks of that system is that people can 
anonymously do that.

But the biggest drawback of having oppose in that system is that you can't 
differentiate between people who are voting oppose because they have something 
against a particular candidate, and people who know one candidate and vote in 
the logical way to give most effective support for that candidate. ie support 
the one candidate you know and oppose all the others. I prefer more 
proportional systems such as the STV system used in Ireland, aside from 
encouraging people to vote "positively" such systems also tend to elect a more 
diverse set of candidates.

Regards

Jonathan Cardy


> On 8 Jun 2015, at 18:57, attolippip <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Pardon me, Zana, but why?
> Oppose is just as good as Support, I believe. It means that people have 
> feelings about you.
> And you can change that. Indifference is the problem, imho
> 
> <small>And I still cannot understand why the voting is not open and public...
> We are supposed to get used to express our opinions without fear being 
> (mostly) Wikipedians, aren't we?
> 
> If I vote against someone and it means anything to him/her, (s)he can just 
> ask me why and we can talk (we can do it beforehand, of course :))
> The same thing is about voting for smb. Is it not interesting to know who 
> supports you and why? 
> And the other way around. I would love to know what motivates people to vote 
> against me.
> It helps to see if one is going in the right direction, whatever they may 
> think about it</small>
> 
> Best regards,
> antanana
> ED of Wikimedia Ukraine
> 
> 2015-06-08 20:37 GMT+03:00 Risker <[email protected]>:
>> 
>>> On 6 June 2015 at 18:32, Zana Strkovska <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> Hi everybody,
>>> 
>>> Thank you Anne for mention "only one woman candidate for FDC this year", it 
>>> was me.
>>> I would like to say something: not time, not money is issue for me (I am 
>>> free lancer, meaning I can manage my time). My theory is that I didn't pass 
>>> because I didn't answer questions in the way the community wanted.
>>>  
>>> I am not sure how many woman we have who are free to help, serve and 
>>> travel. But, what I found discourage after mine failure is the oppose 
>>> votes. One thing is to see how many Wikipedians voted for you, but it's not 
>>> so pleasant to count oppose votes.
>>> 
>>> I hope my words could help on why women aren't generally volunteering to 
>>> run.
>>> 
>>> Regards,
>>> Zana
>>> (user:Violetova)
>>  
>> Zana - I would really like to encourage you to post that at the election 
>> post-mortem page, perhaps in the section about voting methodology (which is 
>> titled "Electoral system").[1]  Your perspective, as a candidate, is really 
>> important on this issue.   I have said for a while now that I am unlikely to 
>> ever participate in another WMF-related election, but it was only on reading 
>> what you wrote here that I realized how demoralizing the opposes are in any 
>> of these elections for me as well. 
>>  
>>  
>> Risker/Anne
>>  
>> [1] 
>> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Foundation_elections_2015/Post_mortem
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Gendergap mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> To manage your subscription preferences, including unsubscribing, please 
>> visit:
>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gendergap mailing list
> [email protected]
> To manage your subscription preferences, including unsubscribing, please 
> visit:
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
_______________________________________________
Gendergap mailing list
[email protected]
To manage your subscription preferences, including unsubscribing, please visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap

Reply via email to