Hi, * Anne, thank you for suggestion, I will do that this days.
* Antanana, I am not sure that is possible to talk with all 252 suport voters, but I am sure that 220 oppose voters will not try to find me and say why they voted NO about me. :) Regards, Zana (user:Violetova) 2015-06-08 19:57 GMT+02:00 attolippip <[email protected]>: > Pardon me, Zana, but why? > Oppose is just as good as Support, I believe. It means that people have > feelings about you. > And you can change that. Indifference is the problem, imho > > <small>And I still cannot understand why the voting is not open and > public... > We are supposed to get used to express our opinions without fear being > (mostly) Wikipedians, aren't we? > > If I vote against someone and it means anything to him/her, (s)he can just > ask me why and we can talk (we can do it beforehand, of course :)) > The same thing is about voting for smb. Is it not interesting to know who > supports you and why? > And the other way around. I would love to know what motivates people to > vote against me. > It helps to see if one is going in the right direction, whatever they may > think about it</small> > > Best regards, > antanana > ED of Wikimedia Ukraine > > 2015-06-08 20:37 GMT+03:00 Risker <[email protected]>: > >> >> On 6 June 2015 at 18:32, Zana Strkovska <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hi everybody, >>> >>> Thank you Anne for mention "only one woman candidate for FDC this year", >>> it was me. >>> I would like to say something: not time, not money is issue for me (I am >>> free lancer, meaning I can manage my time). My theory is that I didn't pass >>> because I didn't answer questions in the way the community wanted. >>> >>> I am not sure how many woman we have who are free to help, serve and >>> travel. But, what I found discourage after mine failure is the oppose >>> votes. One thing is to see how many Wikipedians voted for you, but it's not >>> so pleasant to count oppose votes. >>> >>> I hope my words could help on why women aren't generally volunteering to >>> run. >>> >>> Regards, >>> Zana >>> (user:Violetova) >>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> Zana - I would really like to encourage you to post that at the election >> post-mortem page, perhaps in the section about voting methodology (which is >> titled "Electoral system").[1] Your perspective, as a candidate, is really >> important on this issue. I have said for a while now that I am unlikely >> to ever participate in another WMF-related election, but it was only on >> reading what you wrote here that I realized how demoralizing the opposes >> are in any of these elections for me as well. >> >> >> Risker/Anne >> >> [1] >> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Foundation_elections_2015/Post_mortem >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Gendergap mailing list >> [email protected] >> To manage your subscription preferences, including unsubscribing, please >> visit: >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap >> > >
_______________________________________________ Gendergap mailing list [email protected] To manage your subscription preferences, including unsubscribing, please visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
