<SARCASM> That's correct - it doesn't fit well on modern computers and leaves far too much free space on the hard disk - WindowsXP is much better in this respect and can fill up a healthy 1Gb of disk space without too much trouble ... Remember that old saw about "the devil makes work for idle hands..." - it works for that free space on your disk drive too.</SARCASM>
> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf > Of Nashid Hasan > Sent: Monday, February 24, 2003 4:34 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [brlug-general] Windows more stable than Linux: Stratus > > > Below is an excerpt of an article from ZDNet Australia..... > Read the last line and tell me what your reaction > is..........well, my reaction is I AM FUMING....... > > It's one thing to say Windows is more stable than Linux but > when someone makes a comment that Linux is not suitable for > modern computing they are stepping over the line..... > > > "One thing where Linux is better is Microsoft doesn't have the Unix > culture," he said. "[The Unix culture] is going to be much more > comfortable on Linux, and the applications will port more easily to > Linux than to Windows." However, he added Linux is "based on > 70's Unix", > and doesn't fit well on modern computers. > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > > Here is the link to it: > http://www.zdnet.com.au/newstech/os/story/0,2000024997,20272277,00.htm > > > _______________________________________________ > General mailing list > [email protected] > http://oxygen.nocdirect.com/mailman/listinfo/general_brlug.net >
