I still have a floppy-based distribution of Xenix.  Very old, I wonder
if the floppies still work.

-D

On Mon, 2003-02-24 at 17:16, Edmund Cramp wrote:
> http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&q=xenix+microsoft
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf
> > Of Nashid Hasan
> > Sent: Monday, February 24, 2003 4:34 PM
> > To: [email protected]
> > Subject: [brlug-general] Windows more stable than Linux: Stratus
> >
> >
> > Below is an excerpt of an article from ZDNet Australia.....
> > Read the last line and tell me what your reaction
> > is..........well, my reaction is I AM FUMING.......
> >
> > It's one thing to say Windows is more stable than Linux but
> > when someone makes a comment that Linux is not suitable for
> > modern computing they are stepping over the line.....
> >
> >
> > "One thing where Linux is better is Microsoft doesn't have the Unix
> > culture," he said. "[The Unix culture] is going to be much more
> > comfortable on Linux, and the applications will port more easily to
> > Linux than to Windows." However, he added Linux is "based on
> > 70's Unix",
> > and doesn't fit well on modern computers.
> > -----------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > Here is the link to it:
> > http://www.zdnet.com.au/newstech/os/story/0,2000024997,20272277,00.htm
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > General mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://oxygen.nocdirect.com/mailman/listinfo/general_brlug.net
> >
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> General mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://oxygen.nocdirect.com/mailman/listinfo/general_brlug.net



Reply via email to