Brad,
I was with Cox about a year while they were with @home.  Still with them 
after the conversion to cox.net.  I also found their support and service 
was excellent considering the crossover complexity.  As a consumer I find 
cox.net much more stable than the old @home.  Their support is also 
excellent.  I really see no reason for the lawsuit except that some lawyers 
will get richer.

Really, the settlement is minimal from the point of view of loss to Cox, 
supplying only 10.00 worth of service to each subscriber, so I doubt that 
the settlement payout will hurt Cox.  However the court costs and other 
legal costs could possibly outweigh any other losses to them.

In addition, their charges for this service is, in my opinion, very 
reasonable.  Before Cox, my wife and I both had dial-up accounts (about 
20.00 each per month) and each a separate telephone line (over 20.00 each 
per month).  So by switching to Cox, and putting on my network, we were 
able to save about 40.00 per month, and have extremely fast access with 
seven email addresses and seven web pages available.

Bill

At 01:33 PM 3/28/03 -0600, you wrote:

>Was anyone out there using COX.net when it was [EMAIL PROTECTED] and went
>through the conversion process with them?
>I received a letter in the mail talking about a class action suit
>against COX. I just wonder if anyone has any better information
>about this suit. Isn't there some COX employees on the list
>that can offer some insight? Basically the letter says if you want
>in on the suit then don't do anything and you'll get some further
>instructions.
>
>I was with COX during the conversion, being a system admin, I didn't
>think it went all that bad. I know what it's like to convert your
>systems and network over to something else. I've never experienced
>a system conversion on such a large scale. I would never have
>expected COX to keep the system up and running 24/7 during this time.
>
>My eyes get real glossy when I get a few paragraphs in to this small
>font letter they sent. I just wonder if any one can sum up the good
>and bad of it?
>
>What do you all think about it?
>
>--
>Brad Bendily - CNA
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>General mailing list
>[email protected]
>http://oxygen.nocdirect.com/mailman/listinfo/general_brlug.net


Reply via email to