On Tue, 2004-10-05 at 03:22 -0500, -ray wrote:
> 
> Scientists pursue science, for the sake of science.  The people they work
> for normally have some financial stake in the science, especially if
> privately funded.  It's hard enough to get funding for a company that
> might actually make money. But private funding purely for the sake of
> science? Gotta be rare...  John told me to use my imagination.  I am.  I 
> imagine spacel travel/tourism will be a multi-billion dollar industry in 
> the next 10-15 years.  I'd think Paul Allen imagines this also.  Not that 
> there's anything wrong with that.  Just don't think that the private 
> sector's involvement in space travel is only for the science of it.
> 
> ray

Being a GNU/Linux user and supporter yourself, I'm quite frankly
astounded at your viewpoint.

GNU/Linux is a technology -> technology is science.  The Free Software
Foundation spent what little money it had on development, and the end
result is a product that they really won't ever see a profit on.  They
did it because it benefits society as a whole (indeed, civilization as a
whole).

It's a pretty cynical viewpoint that sees funding for science as only an
investment with an expected financial return.

David Jackson


Reply via email to