Yes, but if i used 443 then everyone would have to type in https when accessing the site. This is for relatives to see pics of the baby, and I know most of them will just type melancon.org and leave off the https://
On 5/2/05, michael dolan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It's actually been a few years since I've done it. I think it might be > time to do it again. I just played around with it anyway, and when the > Mb died in that computer I stopped.. I knew cox upped both down and > upload speed, but I had a brain freeze. Sorry, I had an exam today. > Michael > > Joey Kelly wrote: > > >On Monday May 2 2005 17:24, michael dolan spake: > > > > > >>You can easily get around your ISP blocking port 80, but the upload > >>speeds will kill you on a cable connection. > >> > >> > > > >Right, you can always use port 443 (SSL). I disagree about the upload > >bandwidth being a problem, however. Cox at this time gives you half a megabit > >upstream, which is more than capable of handling a low-traffic site. We've > >run nolug.org for at least 5 years on either DSL or cable, plus scads of > >other domains as well. > > > > > > > >------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > >_______________________________________________ > >General mailing list > >[email protected] > >http://brlug.net/mailman/listinfo/general_brlug.net > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > General mailing list > [email protected] > http://brlug.net/mailman/listinfo/general_brlug.net > -- Adam Melancon Work: http://www.vermilion.lib.la.us Personal: http://www.melancon.org
