Why not? On Monday 24 September 2007 12:43 am, Shannon Roddy wrote: > On 9/23/07, willhill <williamhill2 at cox.net> wrote: > > Reducing spam does not justify limiting freedom. The US could eliminate > > 80% of the world's spam by outlawing Windows. > > I can't believe that I read that from someone who says that freedom is #1.
- [brlug-general] Mesh networks - Was:... Tim Fournet
- [brlug-general] Blocking port 25 does not cure spam proble... Dustin Puryear
- [brlug-general] Blocking port 25 does not cure spam proble... Dustin Puryear
- [brlug-general] Blocking port 25 does not cure spam p... willhill
- [brlug-general] Blocking port 25 does not cure sp... Dustin Puryear
- [brlug-general] Blocking port 25 does not cur... Brad Bendily
- [brlug-general] Blocking port 25 does not... willhill
- [brlug-general] Blocking port 25 doe... B. Estrade
- [brlug-general] Blocking port 25 doe... Shannon Roddy
- [brlug-general] Blocking port 25... willhill
- [brlug-general] Blocking port 25... B. Estrade
- [brlug-general] Blocking port 25... Dustin Puryear
- [brlug-general] Blocking port 25... willhill
- [brlug-general] Blocking port 25... B. Estrade
- [brlug-general] Blocking port 25... Dustin Puryear
- [brlug-general] Blocking port 25... Brad Bendily
- [brlug-general] Blocking port 25... Dustin Puryear
- [brlug-general] Blocking port 25... willhill
- [brlug-general] Blocking port 25... Andrew Baudouin
- [brlug-general] Blocking port 25 doe... -ray
