On 2010-06-22, David Crossley wrote: > Stefan Bodewig wrote: >> David Crossley wrote: >>> Stefan Bodewig wrote:
>>>> - ask the Forrest and Lenya communities which parts of Cocoon 2.x they >>>> need, remove the Cocoon reactor and only build the parts needed, >>>> finally start building Forrest and Lenya again. >>> For Forrest, we use Cocoon-2.1 branch (i.e. the Ant-based build) >>> and various blocks. >> Is there still any development on the 2.1 branch at all (bug fixes, >> whatever) > It is sporadic. There has been some desire expressed on the Cocoon dev > list to keep maintaining it. However only some commit activity has followed. >> or would it make sense to consider it stale and just package >> up the jars Forrest needs? > Perhaps we could do that until there is further activity > at Cocoon. > Would someone please refer me to a useful example of a > "packaged" gump project. > Where would the packaged jars be stored? One of the (many) pain points in Gump. Currently they are stored inside svn in a PMC private area - so we don't distribute a few things. I think I've added the blocks you need and a cocoon21 project that holds all necessary jars. > By the way, so that people are clear. The current Gump run > happening for "cocoon" is the Maven-based build of Cocoon trunk > (i.e. Cocoon-2.2) Which is even more stale than the 2.1.x branch, I've disabled the build for now > and there is not yet any Gump run for the "cocoon3". And added one for cocoon3. Stefan --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
